# The relationship of the source of punishment and personality traits with investment and punishment in a public goods game

**Authors:** Johannes Rodrigues, Natasha Leipold, Johannes Hewig, Grit Hein

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71106-x · Scientific Reports · 2024-09-09

## TL;DR

This study explores how people decide to punish free riders in a public goods game, showing that using shared resources for punishment and personality traits influence investment and punishment behavior.

## Contribution

The study introduces a modified public goods game to examine the source of punishment and personality traits' impact on cooperative behavior.

## Key findings

- Participants preferred using common pool money to punish free riders, leading to higher investments and stronger punishments.
- Highly altruistic individuals invested more and punished less, but gave harsher punishments when using the common pool.
- Trait anger and empathy were linked to lower investment and punishment, while empathy was associated with even lower punishment.

## Abstract

In this study, we investigated the motivations behind punishing individuals who exploit common resources, a phenomenon crucial for resource preservation. While some researchers suggest punishment stems from concern for the common good, others propose it is driven by anger toward free riders. To probe these motivations, we developed a modified public goods game in which participants had the option to use their own money or the money from the common pool to punish free riders. The analysis included choice behavior, mouse trajectories, and personality traits like anger, empathy, and altruism. According to our results, investments were highest, and punishment was strongest if participants could punish using credits from the common pool, indicating that this is the preferred option to diminish free riding and maintain cooperation in public goods and common good contexts. Also, punishment was highest if the punisher’s own investment was high, and the investment of others was low. Concerning traits, highly altruistic individuals tended to invest more and punish less in general but gave harsher punishments when they did choose to use the common pool punitively. Conversely, trait anger and trait empathy were linked to low investment while trait empathy also tended to be related to lower punishment. Taken together, these findings underscore the role of situational factors and personality traits in fostering cooperative behavior and shaping societal norms around costly punishment.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11385193/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11385193/full.md

## References

5 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11385193/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11385193