Draft genomes of one Staphylococcus haemolyticus and five Staphylococcus lugdunensis strains isolated from catheterized urine samples of females
Helen Appleberry, Haaris Anjum, Taleah Cage, Kayla Jarm, Haashir Khan, Lizzie Proctor, Junelle Saroca, Alan J. Wolfe, Catherine Putonti, Alex Kula

TL;DR
This paper presents draft genomes of six staphylococcus strains isolated from urine samples of women with urinary tract symptoms.
Contribution
The novel contribution is the draft genome sequencing of one S. haemolyticus and five S. lugdunensis strains from catheterized urine samples.
Findings
Draft genomes of five S. lugdunensis and one S. haemolyticus strains were sequenced.
The strains were isolated from catheterized urine samples of females with lower urinary tract symptoms.
Abstract
Although Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus lugdunensis are members of the normal human flora, they also can cause infection. Here, we present the draft genomes of five strains of S. lugdunensis and one strain of S. haemolyticus isolated from transurethral catheterized urine samples from different females experiencing lower urinary tract symptoms.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Strain | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of Raw Reads | 2,584,846 | 2,130,040 | 2,186,190 | 2,157,860 | 1,915,472 | 2,971,182 |
| Assembly Length (bp) | 2,414,972 | 2,526,737 | 2,538,396 | 2,542,811 | 2,496,650 | 2,537,671 |
| G + C (%) | 32.74 | 33.68 | 33.65 | 33.64 | 33.77 | 33.65 |
| No. of Contigs | 62 | 22 | 28 | 27 | 15 | 32 |
| Contigs N50 (bp) | 106,858 | 285,955 | 188,585 | 369,218 | 629,127 | 188,585 |
| Coverage (x) | 136.19 | 119.72 | 118.19 | 111.41 | 103.87 | 145.19 |
| Completeness (%) | 99.31 | 97.61 | 97.69 | 97.66 | 96.47 | 97.69 |
| Contamination (%) | 0 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.34 |
| Symptom Status | rUTI | OAB | OAB | OAB | OAB | OAB |
| IRB Protocol No. (Institution) | 170077AW (UCSD) | |||||
| Study Reference(s) | 11, 12 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 9, 10 | 9, 10 |
| SRA Accession No. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assembly Accession No. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- —Loyola University Chicago (LUC)
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing · Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus · Urinary Tract Infections Management
ANNOUNCEMENT
Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus lugdunensis are coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and “commensal” members of the skin microbiota (1, 2). However, both are known opportunistic pathogens (3, 4). While S. haemolyticus is the second-most frequently isolated CoNS from urine samples, incidences of S. haemolyticus-associated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are rising (5). S. lugdunensis is recognized as a rare cause of UTIs, while also a part of the nonpathogenic flora of the urobiome (6). Here, we present a S. haemolyticus strain, isolated from the urine of a female diagnosed with recurrent UTI (rUTI), and five S. lugdunensis strains, isolated from five different females with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. While prior studies have found instances in which Staphylococcus sp. have been more abundant in the urinary microbiota of individuals with OAB, it is unknown if this is associated with the symptoms observed (7, 8).
These urine samples were collected as part of prior IRB-approved studies (see Table 1) (9–13). The strains were cultured from the urine samples by the enhanced quantitative urine culture (EQUC) method (14). Species identification was determined using a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometer (MALDI-TOF MS; Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA) as previously described (15), and the isolates were stored at −80°C in the Loyola Urinary Education and Research Collaborative (LUEREC) collection. Samples were retrieved from this collection and streaked on tryptone soy agar (TSA) plates and were incubated in 5% CO_2_ for 24 hours at 35°C. Liquid tryptone soy medium was inoculated with single colonies from these plates and incubated in 5% CO_2_ for 24 hours at 35°C. DNA was extracted from the liquid cultures with the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturer's protocol for Gram-positive species. DNA was sent to SeqCoast (Portsmouth, NH) for library preparation using the DNA Prep tagmentation kit (Illumina) and unique dual indexes. These libraries were then sequenced by SeqCoast on the Illumina NextSeq2000 platform with a 300-cycle flow cell kit (2 × 150 bp reads). The BV-BRC website, v3.35.5 (16), was used for genome assembly with the “auto” parameter. There the reads were trimmed by trim_galore v0.6.5dev (https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore), assembled by Unicycler v0.4.8 (17), and polished with Pilon v1.23 (18). Taxonomy was confirmed with the Type Strain Genome Server (TYGS) (19). Assemblies were annotated by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v.6.7 (20). Coverage was calculated by BV-BRC; genome completeness and contamination were computed by CheckM v1.2.2 (21) upon submission to NCBI. Default parameters were used unless otherwise specified.
Information regarding the sequencing of these six strains, S. haemolyticus UMB3106B and S. lugdunensis UMB1735, UMB5747, UMB7308, UMB8915, and UMB8974, can be found in Table 1. For both species, the number of sequenced isolates from the urinary tract is limited. Further sequencing of Staphylococcus isolates from the urine of individuals with OAB is needed to explore associations between symptoms and CoNS species.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Bieber L, Kahlmeter G. 2010. Staphylococcus lugdunensis in several niches of the normal skin flora. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:385–388. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02813.x 19519842 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Byrd AL, Belkaid Y, Segre JA. 2018. The human skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:143–155. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.15729332945 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Heilbronner S, Foster TJ. 2021. Staphylococcus lugdunensis: a skin commensal with invasive pathogenic potential. Clin Microbiol Rev 34:e 00205-20. doi:10.1128/CMR.00205-2033361142 PMC 7950365 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Rossi CC, Ahmad F, Giambiagi-de Marval M. 2024. Staphylococcus haemolyticus: an updated review on nosocomial infections, antimicrobial resistance, virulence, genetic traits, and strategies for combating this emerging opportunistic pathogen. Microbiol Res 282:127652. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2024.12765238432015 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Moreland RB, Choi BI, Geaman W, Gonzalez C, Hochstedler-Kramer BR, John J, Kaindl J, Kesav N, Lamichhane J, Lucio L, Saxena M, Sharma A, Tinawi L, Vanek ME, Putonti C, Brubaker L, Wolfe AJ. 2023. Beyond the usual suspects: emerging uropathogens in the microbiome age. Front Urol 3:1212590. doi:10.3389/fruro.2023.1212590 · doi ↗
- 6Haile DT, Hughes J, Vetter E, Kohner P, Snyder R, Patel R, Cockerill FR III. 2002. Frequency of isolation of Staphylococcus lugdunensisin consecutive urine cultures and relationship to urinary tract infection. J Clin Microbiol 40:654–656. doi:10.1128/JCM.40.2.654-656.200211825988 PMC 153380 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Wu P, Chen Y, Zhao J, Zhang G, Chen J, Wang J, Zhang H. 2017. Urinary microbiome and psychological factors in women with overactive bladder. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:488. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2017.0048829230385 PMC 5712163 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Khan Z, Healey GD, Paravati R, Berry N, Rees E, Margarit L, Gonzalez D, Emery S, Conlan RS. 2021. Chronic urinary infection in overactive bladder syndrome: a prospective, blinded case control study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:752275. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.75227534660348 PMC 8515879 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
