Draft genome sequences of four Corynebacterium amycolatum strains isolated from female urine samples
Alex Kula, Grace Chilton, James Damaso, Yusef Golzar, Fatima Rushnaiwala, Helen Appleberry, Alan J. Wolfe, Catherine Putonti

TL;DR
This paper provides draft genome sequences of four Corynebacterium amycolatum strains from female urine samples, helping to understand this emerging urinary tract pathogen.
Contribution
The novelty lies in presenting draft genomes of C. amycolatum strains from both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.
Findings
Draft genomes of four C. amycolatum strains were successfully sequenced.
The strains were isolated from both symptomatic and asymptomatic female participants.
This contributes to the genomic characterization of C. amycolatum as an emerging urinary tract pathogen.
Abstract
Corynebacterium amycolatum is an emerging pathogen of the urinary tract. Here, we present the draft genomes for four strains isolated from urine collected from symptomatic and asymptomatic female participants.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Strain | UMB0362 | UMB3010 | UMB3517 | UMB7578 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRA Accession no. |
|
|
|
|
| Assembly Accession no. |
|
|
|
|
| No. of raw reads | 2,044,004 | 1,780,282 | 2,784,774 | 2,504,768 |
| Assembly length (bp) | 2,503,085 | 2,456,972 | 2,501,019 | 2,554,220 |
| G + C (%) | 58.76 | 58.93 | 58.85 | 58.7 |
| No. of contigs | 53 | 44 | 32 | 49 |
| Contigs N50 (bp) | 127,036 | 107,160 | 216,091 | 135,435 |
| Coverage (x) | 115.19 | 102.27 | 146.26 | 135.60 |
| Completeness (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Contamination (%) | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Symptom status | Asymptomatic | OAB | OAB | rUTI |
| IRB no. (Institution) | 170077AW (UCSD) | |||
| Study reference | ( | ( | ( | ( |
- —Loyola University Chicago (LUC)
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsUrinary Tract Infections Management · Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus · Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
ANNOUNCEMENT
Although Corynebacterium amycolatum is a commensal member of the skin flora, it is an opportunistic pathogen associated with cellulitis, endocarditis, peritonitis, and sepsis (1). Strains of this species also have been isolated from urinary samples (2) and posited to be an opportunistic pathogen of the urinary tract (3). To further investigate the genomic content of C. amycolatum strains from the urinary tract, here we present four genomes: UMB3517 and UMB3010, isolated from catheterized urine samples from females with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms, UMB7578, isolated from a voided urine sample from a female diagnosed with recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs), and UMB0362, isolated from a catheterized urine sample from an asymptomatic (healthy) female.
Urine samples were collected as part of prior institutional review board (IRB) approved studies [see Table 1; (4–7)]. Strains were isolated from the sample using the expanded quantitative urine culture (EQUC) method (8) for the Loyola Urinary Education and Research Collaborative (LUEREC) collection. Prior to banking the strains, the genus and species were determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF), as previously described (9). The frozen stock was obtained from the collection and streaked on a Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar plate and incubated at 35°C in 5% CO_2_ for 24 h. A single colony was selected and grown in liquid BHI medium under the same culture conditions. DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturer’s instructions for Gram-positive organisms. Sequencing and library preparation were performed by SeqCoast Genomics (Portsmouth, NH). Samples were prepared with an Illumina DNA Prep tagmentation kit and sequenced with the Illumina NextSeq2000 platform (2 × 150 bp reads). Assemblies were performed using BV-BRC v3.35.5 (10) with the “auto” parameter. Briefly, the raw reads were trimmed using Trim Galore v0.6.5 (https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore) and assembled using Unicycler v0.4.8 (11), followed by polishing with Pilon v1.23 (12). The genome assemblies were annotated using the BV-BRC Genome Annotation tool (10) and the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v6.7 (13); the latter is the publicly available annotation. Genome coverage, completeness, and contamination were calculated by BV-BRC. Virulence factor screening was performed using the VFanalyzer tool (14). Unless specified otherwise, default parameters were used for all software tools.
Table 1 lists the genome assembly statistics for the four C. amycolatum strains. Virulence factor predictions for all four genome assemblies identified genes associated with siderophore-dependent iron uptake (irp6A, irp6B, and irp6C), regulation (dtxR, mprB, senX3, sigA/proV, and whiB3), and other virulence-associated classes. The virulence factor profiles for these four strains are congruent with those noted in the recent pangenomic study of the 26 publicly available genome assemblies for the species (15). The authors of this prior study suggest that these virulence factors were acquired via horizontal gene transfer, enabling the invasive phenotype observed in strains responsible for infections (15). Further sequencing and subsequent investigation of C. amycolatum genomes is needed to understand the prevalence of horizontal gene transfer in this species.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Bernard K. 2012. The genus Corynebacterium and other medically relevant coryneform-like bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50:3152–3158. doi:10.1128/JCM.00796-1222837327 PMC 3457441 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Thomas-White K, Forster SC, Kumar N, Van Kuiken M, Putonti C, Stares MD, Hilt EE, Price TK, Wolfe AJ, Lawley TD. 2018. Culturing of female bladder bacteria reveals an interconnected urogenital microbiota. Nat Commun 9:1557. doi:10.1038/s 41467-018-03968-529674608 PMC 5908796 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Moreland RB, Choi BI, Geaman W, Gonzalez C, Hochstedler-Kramer BR, John J, Kaindl J, Kesav N, Lamichhane J, Lucio L, Saxena M, Sharma A, Tinawi L, Vanek ME, Putonti C, Brubaker L, Wolfe AJ. 2023. Beyond the usual suspects: emerging uropathogens in the microbiome age. Front. Urol 3:2023. doi:10.3389/fruro.2023.1212590 · doi ↗
- 4Thomas-White K, Taege S, Limeira R, Brincat C, Joyce C, Hilt EE, Mac-Daniel L, Radek KA, Brubaker L, Mueller ER, Wolfe AJ. 2020. Vaginal estrogen therapy is associated with increased Lactobacillus in the urine of postmenopausal women with overactive bladder symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 223:727. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.006PMC 760959732791124 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Burnett LA, Hochstedler BR, Weldon K, Wolfe AJ, Brubaker L. 2021. Recurrent urinary tract infection: association of clinical profiles with urobiome composition in women. Neurourol Urodyn 40:1479–1489. doi:10.1002/nau.2470734036621 PMC 8298270 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Hochstedler BR, Burnett L, Price TK, Jung C, Wolfe AJ, Brubaker L. 2022. Urinary microbiota of women with recurrent urinary tract infection: collection and culture methods. Int Urogynecol J 33:563–570. doi:10.1007/s 00192-021-04780-433852041 PMC 8514570 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Price TK, Hilt EE, Thomas-White K, Mueller ER, Wolfe AJ, Brubaker L. 2020. The urobiome of continent adult women: a cross-sectional study. BJOG 127:193–201. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.1592031469215 PMC 7197444 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Price TK, Dune T, Hilt EE, Thomas-White KJ, Kliethermes S, Brincat C, Brubaker L, Wolfe AJ, Mueller ER, Schreckenberger PC. 2016. The clinical urine culture: enhanced techniques improve detection of clinically relevant microorganisms. J Clin Microbiol 54:1216–1222. doi:10.1128/JCM.00044-1626962083 PMC 4844725 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
