Author Correction: Visual search patterns during exploration of naturalistic scenes are driven by saliency cues in individuals with cerebral visual impairment
Kerri Walter, Claire E. Manley, Peter J. Bex, Lotfi B. Merabet
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection
Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-024-53642-8, published online 06 February 2024
The original version of this Article contained errors in the Results, under the subheading ‘ROC analysis’, where incorrect values were stated.
As a result,
“For the semantic model prediction, controls had higher ROC scores compared to the CVI group for both the image (controls: 1201.33 ms ± 131.55 SD, CVI: 1792.18 ms ± 332.84 SD; t(27.005) = 5.144, p < 0.001, d = 1.862) and text (controls: 1356.83 ms ± 149.62 SD, CVI: 2011.50 ms ± 544.33 SD; t(27.926) = 6.08, p < 0.001, d = 2.212) cue conditions (Fig. 3F).”
now reads:
“For the semantic model prediction, controls had higher ROC scores compared to the CVI group for both the image (controls: 0.80 ± 0.08 SD, CVI: 0.65 ± 0.09 SD; t(27.005) = 5.144, p < 0.001, d = 1.862) and text (controls: 0.77 ± 0.08, CVI: 0.60 ± 0.07 SD; t(27.926) = 6.08, p < 0.001, d = 2.212) cue conditions (Fig. 3F).”
The original Article has been corrected.