Correction to “Comprehensive analysis of clinical prognosis and biological significance of CNIH4 in cervical cancer”Wang J, Wang S, Wang J, Huang J, Lu H, Pan B, Pan H, Song Y, Deng Q, Jin X, Shi G. Comprehensive analysis of clinical prognosis and biological significance of CNIH4 in cervical cancer. Cancer Med. 2023;12(24):22381–22394. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6734
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCancer Mechanisms and Therapy · 14-3-3 protein interactions
In section 2.7 on page 22383, “Tubulin (1:20000, Proteintech)” should have read “Actin (1:80000, ABclonal).” In Figure 3, Part A, on page 22388, “Tubulin” was incorrect and should have read “Actin.” Please see the corrected figure below. Although we used both Actin and Tubulin as the internal reference genes in the pre‐experiment, the statistics of the data show Actin instead of Tubulin.
We apologize for these errors.