# Evaluating the effects of empagliflozin in preventing myocardial injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial

## TL;DR

This study tested if empagliflozin can prevent heart injury during a common heart procedure, but found no significant benefits.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence on empagliflozin's ineffectiveness in preventing PCI-related myocardial injury.

## Key findings

- Empagliflozin did not reduce cTnI levels at baseline, 8 hours, or 24 hours after PCI.
- hs-CRP levels showed no significant differences between the empagliflozin and placebo groups.
- No major adverse cardiac events occurred in either group.

## Abstract

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is a fundamental procedure for coronary artery disease management, yet the risk of adverse events such periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) persists. This double-blind, randomized clinical trial aims to assess the efficacy of empagliflozin in preventing myocardial injury during PCI procedure.

A total of 90 patients were randomly assigned to two groups A and B; Group A as the intervention group received empagliflozin 25 mg 24 hours before and empagliflozin 10 mg 1-2 hours before coronary intervention and group Bas the control group received placebo at similar intervals. The primary outcome involved comparing baseline, 8-hour, and 24-hour cTnI and baseline and 24-hour hs-CRP levels after PCI in both groups to measure the incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) and anti-inflammatory effects of empagliflozin.

Baseline cTnI levels with P=0.955, 8 hours after PCI with P=0.469, and 24 hours after the intervention with P=0.980 were not statistically different in the two groups. Baseline levels of hs-CRP in both intervention and control groups were not statistically significantly different (P=0.982). Also, there was no statistically significant difference in hs-CRP levels 24 hours after PCI in two groups (P=0.198). Finally, the results showed that MACEs did not occur in any of the groups.

The results of this trial could not express the advantages of acute pretreatment with empagliflozin in preventing PCI-related myocardial injury.