Temporal localization of upper extremity bilateral synergistic coordination using wearable accelerometers
Khadija F. Zaidi, Qi Wei

TL;DR
This study uses wearable accelerometers to explore how young and older adults coordinate their upper limbs during daily tasks, revealing age-related differences in movement patterns.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel use of wearable accelerometers and Expanding Procrustes methodology to objectively quantify bilateral and intra-limb coordination during ADLs.
Findings
Younger participants showed stronger intra-limb coordination, particularly in upper arm and forearm segments.
Older participants exhibited longer periods of inter-limb coordination, especially during task completion.
Task complexity reduced movement similarity across both age groups.
Abstract
The human upper extremity is characterized by inherent motor abundance, allowing a diverse array of tasks with agility and adaptability. Upper extremity functional limitations are a common sequela to Stroke, resulting in pronounced motor and sensory impairments in the contralesional arm. While many therapeutic interventions focus on rehabilitating the weaker arm, it is increasingly evident that it is necessary to consider bimanual coordination and motor control. Participants were recruited to two groups differing in age (Group 1 (n = 10): 23.4 ± 2.9 years, Group 2 (n = 10): 55.9 ± 10.6 years) for an exploratory study on the use of accelerometry to quantify bilateral coordination. Three tasks featuring coordinated reaching were selected to investigate the acceleration of the upper arm, forearm, and hand during activities of daily living (ADLs). Subjects were equipped with acceleration…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMuscle activation and electromyography studies · Motor Control and Adaptation · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
