Skill Enactment Among University Students Using a Brief Video-Based Mental Health Intervention: Mixed Methods Study Within a Randomized Controlled Trial

TL;DR

A study tested a digital mental health program for university students but found it didn't improve skill use or mental health outcomes.

Contribution

The study explores skill enactment in digital mental health interventions and identifies factors influencing individual engagement.

Findings

The intervention did not significantly improve skill enactment or reduce depression/anxiety symptoms.

Higher skill enactment was associated with lower symptom levels across both groups.

Participants were motivated by personally relevant, easy-to-integrate, or previously effective skills.

Abstract

Mental health problems are common among university students, yet many students do not seek professional help. Digital mental health interventions can increase students’ access to support and have been shown to be effective in preventing and treating mental health problems. However, little is known about the extent to which students implement therapeutic skills from these programs in everyday life (ie, skill enactment) or about the impact of skill enactment on outcomes.

This study aims to assess the effects of a low-intensity video-based intervention, Uni Virtual Clinic Lite (UVC-Lite), in improving skill enactment relative to an attention-control program (primary aim) and examine whether skill enactment influences symptoms of depression and anxiety (secondary aim). The study also qualitatively explored participants’ experiences of, and motivations for, engaging with the therapeutic techniques.

We analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of UVC-Lite for symptoms of depression and anxiety among university students with mild to moderate levels of psychological distress. Participants were recruited from universities across Australia and randomly assigned to 6 weeks of self-guided use of UVC-Lite (243/487, 49.9%) or an attention-control program (244/487, 50.1%). Quantitative data on skill enactment, depression, and anxiety were collected through baseline, postintervention, and 3- and 6-month follow-up surveys. Qualitative data were obtained from 29 intervention-group participants through open-ended questions during postintervention surveys (n=17, 59%) and semistructured interviews (n=12, 41%) after the intervention period concluded.

Mixed model repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated that the intervention did not significantly improve skill enactment (F3,215.36=0.50; P=.68). Skill enactment was also not found to influence change in symptoms of depression (F3,241.10=1.69; P=.17) or anxiety (F3,233.71=1.11; P=.35). However, higher levels of skill enactment were associated with lower symptom levels among both intervention and control group participants across time points (depression: F1,541.87=134.61; P<.001; anxiety: F1,535.11=73.08; P<.001). Inductive content analysis confirmed low levels of skill enactment among intervention group participants. Participants were motivated to use techniques and skills that were perceived to be personally relevant, easily integrated into daily life, and that were novel or had worked for them in the past.

The intervention did not improve skill enactment or mental health among students with mild to moderate psychological distress. Low adherence impacted our ability to draw robust conclusions regarding the intervention’s impact on outcomes. Factors influencing skill enactment differed across individuals, suggesting that it may be necessary to tailor therapeutic skills and engagement strategies to the individual user. Theoretically informed research involving collaboration with end users is needed to understand the processes underlying skill enactment in digital mental health interventions.

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621000375853; https://tinyurl.com/7b9ar54r

Figures