# Electromicrobiological concentration cells are an overlooked potential energy conservation mechanism for subsurface microorganisms

**Authors:** Ian P. G. Marshall

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1407868 · 2024-08-21

## TL;DR

This paper explores how concentration differences in chemical species can help subsurface microorganisms conserve energy through a newly proposed mechanism called ElectroMicrobiological Concentration Cells.

## Contribution

The paper introduces the concept of ElectroMicrobiological Concentration Cells as a novel energy conservation mechanism for subsurface microorganisms.

## Key findings

- Concentration differences can contribute to a net negative change in Gibbs free energy for microbial metabolism.
- ElectroMicrobiological Concentration Cells allow the same redox reaction to run in both forward and reverse directions simultaneously.
- The model examines oxygen, sulfide, and hydrogen concentration cells as specific examples of this mechanism.

## Abstract

Thermodynamics has predicted many different kinds of microbial metabolism by determining which pairs of electron acceptors and donors will react to produce an exergonic reaction (a negative net change in Gibbs free energy). In energy-limited environments, such as the deep subsurface, such an approach can reveal the potential for unexpected or counter-intuitive energy sources for microbial metabolism. Up until recently, these thermodynamic calculations have been carried out with the assumption that chemical species appearing on the reactant and product side of a reaction formula have a constant concentration, and thus do not count towards net concentration changes and the overall direction of the reaction. This assumption is reasonable considering microorganisms are too small (~1 μm) for any significant differences in concentration to overcome diffusion. However, recent discoveries have demonstrated that the reductive and oxidative halves of reactions can be separated by much larger distances, from millimetres to centimetres via conductive filamentous bacteria, mineral conductivity, and biofilm conductivity. This means that the concentrations of reactants and products can indeed be different, and that concentration differences can contribute to the net negative change in Gibbs free energy. It even means that the same redox reaction, simultaneously running in forward and reverse, can drive energy conservation, in an ElectroMicrobiological Concentration Cell (EMCC). This paper presents a model to investigate this phenomenon and predict under which circumstances such concentration-driven metabolism might take place. The specific cases of oxygen concentration cells, sulfide concentration cells, and hydrogen concentration cells are examined in more detail.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** oxygen (PubChem CID 977), sulfide (PubChem CID 29109), hydrogen (PubChem CID 783)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** hydrogen (MESH:D006859), oxygen (MESH:D010100), sulfide (MESH:D013440)

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11371792/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11371792