Need for Echocardiographic Analysis of Abdominal Aorta Dimensions and Their Associations with Demographic Characteristics in Healthy Individuals
Haleh Bodagh, Kamran Mohammadi, Asma Yousefzadeh, Mehran Rahimi, Mehrnoush Toufan-Tabrizi

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Dear Editor,
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) pertain to dilations in the abdominal aorta. A practical definition of an abdominal aortic aneurysm is a transverse diameter of 3 cm or more [1]. In the general population, the prevalence of AAA is observed in males at a prevalence ranging from 5.3% to 6.7%, while in females, the prevalence falls within the range of 1.2% to 1.9% [2]. Most affected individuals are unaware of their condition [3]. Aortic aneurysms rank as the 14th leading cause of death in the United States, with numerous fatalities occurring annually due to ruptured AAAs or preventive procedures [4]. Various risk factors significantly elevate the likelihood of developing an abdominal aortic aneurysm, including age over 60, smoking, and high blood pressure [5]. The probability of aneurysm rupture is influenced by factors such as aneurysm size, rate of expansion, smoking, and persistent hypertension [6].
Most abdominal aortic aneurysms are asymptomatic and are incidentally detected through imaging techniques such as ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging, presenting challenges for screening. Despite these challenges, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends abdominal ultrasonography screening for men between the ages of 65 and 75 with a history of smoking [7]. Moreover, age, gender, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and body surface area (BSA) are among multiple factors that have been shown to significantly associate with the size of the abdominal aorta [8]. Although studies have explored the diameter of the abdominal aorta in some populations, determining the normal diameter of the abdominal aorta in diverse populations, its correlation with demographic factors, and ultimately a normal range in healthy people is crucial for diagnosing and managing abdominal aortic diseases [9].
The routine assessment of the proximal abdominal aorta alongside the inferior vena cava (IVC) is a common practice for echocardiologists [10]. Despite being often used in the clinical setting, this aspect of echocardiography may not have received adequate attention. Many individuals undergo routine echocardiographic assessment of the proximal abdominal aorta at medical facilities, presenting a valuable opportunity for early diagnosis. To achieve this, precise measurements of the abdominal aorta’s size in normal individuals and its relationship with other aortic segments need accurate determination. There is a need for studies that aim to contribute to the broader understanding of abdominal aortic diameters by shedding light on the size of the abdominal aorta in a healthy population.
In conclusion, we emphasize the critical need for an echocardiographic analysis of abdominal aorta dimensions and their associations with demographic characteristics in healthy individuals. Also, we suggest using age, gender, and BSA to be included and analyzed in healthy individuals in the future studies as they are the most important demographic and anthropometric factors in AAA [11].
Conflict of Interest
None.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Prisant LM Mondy III Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm J Clin Hypertens 20046285910.1111/j.1524-6175.2004.02838.x PMC 810933214872146 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Li X Zhao G Zhang J Duan Z Xin S Prevalence and trends of the abdominal aortic aneurysms epidemic in general population--a meta-analysis P Lo S One 2013812 e 81260 e 8126010.1371/journal.pone.0081260 PMC 384684124312543 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Zimmerman DL Min D-J Summers KL Sheahan C Sheahan MG Health literacy and abdominal aortic aneurysms J Vasc Surg 2020712490610.1016/j.jvs.2019.03.06331204214 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Aggarwal S Qamar A Sharma V Sharma A Abdominal aortic aneurysm: A comprehensive review Exp Clin Cardiol 2011161115 PMC 307616021523201 · pubmed ↗
- 5Altobelli E Rapacchietta L Profeta VF Fagnano R Risk Factors for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Population-Based Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Int J Env Res Pub He 201815122805280510.3390/ijerph 15122805 PMC 631380130544688 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Lo RC Lu B Fokkema MT Conrad M Patel VI Fillinger Metal Relative importance of aneurysm diameter and body size for predicting abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture in men and women J Vasc Surg 201459512091610.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.104PMC 400468824388278 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Force UPST Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement JAMA 2019322222211810.1001/jama.2019.1892831821437 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Lederle FA Johnson GR Wilson SE Gordon IL Chute EP Littooy F Netal Relationship of age, gender, race, and body size to infrarenal aortic diameter J Vasc Surg 199726459560110.1016/s 0741-5214(97)70057-09357459 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
