# Evaluation of outcomes and utility of abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance in octogenarians and nonagenarians

## TL;DR

This study examines the effectiveness of monitoring abdominal aortic aneurysms in elderly patients, finding that few require intervention.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into the utility of AAA surveillance in octogenarians and nonagenarians.

## Key findings

- Only 2.0% of patients in the study underwent aneurysm intervention.
- Threshold size was achieved in 8.3%, 14.8%, and 26.7% of patients in the 80–84, 85–89, and 90+ age groups, respectively.
- Operative intervention was possible in 2.8%, 0.8%, and 0% of patients in the respective age groups.

## Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of our regional abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme in octogenarians and nonagenarians. This was to help decide whether discontinuation might be appropriate in certain instances. Primary outcomes were the number of patients who reached threshold (5.5cm) and the number where intervention was offered. Secondary outcome was cost effectiveness.

A retrospective review of a regional AAA surveillance database was carried out to evaluate outcomes. Data collected included patient age, sex, date of first and last scan, initial and latest size of aneurysm, outcome, time under surveillance and total number of scans. Patients were divided into three groups (80–84 years, 85–89 years and 90+ years).

The number of patients in this age group was 354. Only 2.0% (n=7) of patients underwent intervention. Threshold size was achieved in 8.3% (n=18), 14.8% (n=18) and 26.7% (n=4), in the age groups 80–84 years, 85–89 years and 90+ years, respectively. Of these patients, operative intervention was possible in 2.8% (n=6), 0.8% (n=1) and 0% (n=0), respectively.

A relatively small number of octogenarians and nonagenarians reach the threshold size during surveillance. An even smaller proportion require repair of their aneurysm. While there may be a role for AAA surveillance in octogenarians in highly selected groups, these data should inform the discussions made with individual patients. It should also inform future evaluation of such surveillance.