# Systems issues limiting acute fracture care delivery at a tertiary care hospital in Northern Tanzania

**Authors:** Papa Kwadwo Morgan-Asiedu, George William Fryhofer, William Mack Hardaker, Ajay Premkumar, Max Shin, Sireesh Ramesh, Christian Pean, Mubashir Alavi Jusabani, Rogers Temu, Honest Massawe, Neil Perry Sheth

PMC · DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2024.48.29.41286 · The Pan African Medical Journal · 2024-05-29

## TL;DR

This study examines why many patients in Tanzania receive inadequate surgical treatment for acute fractures, identifying key system limitations like lack of equipment and implants.

## Contribution

The study is the first to assess the adequacy of surgical treatment for acute fractures in sub-Saharan Africa and identify specific systems limitations.

## Key findings

- Surgery was indicated for 94.6% of cases but performed in only 58.4%.
- 42.9% of surgeries were deemed inadequate due to unavailability of implants and fluoroscopy.
- Lack of intraoperative fluoroscopy and implant availability were the most common limitations.

## Abstract

sub-Saharan Africa experiences a significant musculoskeletal trauma burden. Among patients who receive surgical treatment, there have been no reports as to how often surgical care is determined to be “adequate” or, if “inadequate”, then what hospital and orthopaedic specialty-specific systems limitations might be prohibitive.

data from patients presenting to the orthopaedic trauma service at a tertiary care center in sub-Saharan Africa were prospectively collected over a 6-week period and then retrospectively reviewed to determine whether the surgical treatment was “adequate” (or otherwise, “inadequate”) according to the principle of restoring length, alignment, and rotation. Exclusion criteria included insufficient clinical information; isolated spinal injury; infection; cases involving only removal of hardware; soft-tissue procedures; tumor cases; and medical (non-surgical) conditions.

112 cases were included for analysis. Surgery was indicated in 106 of 112 cases (94.6%), and of those, surgery was performed in 62 cases (58.4%). Among patients who underwent surgery with available post-operative imaging (n=56), surgical treatment was “inadequate” in 24 cases (42.9%). The most common reasons treatment was deemed “inadequate” included unavailability of appropriate implants (n=16), unavailability of intraoperative fluoroscopy (n=10) and incomplete intraoperative evaluation of injury (n=5).

several systems limitations prevent the delivery of adequate surgical treatment in patients with acute orthopaedic traumatic injuries, including lack of intraoperative fluoroscopy and lack of implant availability. This study will serve as a useful baseline for ongoing efforts seeking to improve orthopaedic specialty resource availability and facilitate more effective fracture care in this region.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** tumor (MESH:D009369), spinal injury (MESH:D013124), trauma (MESH:D014947), musculoskeletal trauma (MESH:D009140), fracture (MESH:D050723), infection (MESH:D007239)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11364886/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11364886/full.md

## References

22 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11364886/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11364886