# Prevalence, Determinants, and Management Options of Scar Site Pregnancy in Women With Previous Cesarean Section: A Study From the Al-Qassim Region

**Authors:** Zaheera Saadia, Khalid Nasralla, Javed Iqbal, Ebtihal Elamin

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65874 · Cureus · 2024-07-31

## TL;DR

This study examines how common and what factors influence scar site pregnancies in women who have had a cesarean section, in the Al-Qassim region of Saudi Arabia.

## Contribution

The study identifies key risk factors and treatment options for scar site pregnancy in a specific regional population.

## Key findings

- Combined methotrexate and aspiration were the most common treatments for scar site pregnancy.
- The interval between pregnancies and intrauterine contraceptive device use were significant predictors of scar site pregnancy.
- Higher parity was associated with an increased risk of scar site pregnancy.

## Abstract

Introduction: Pregnancy located outside the uterine cavity following a cesarean section has become more prevalent in recent years due to the increase in cesarean section delivery. This study sought to investigate the prevalence, determinants, and treatment options of scar site pregnancy among women who sought maternal and child health services in a hospital in Buraydah, Al-Qassim region, Saudi Arabia.

Methods: Utilizing a quantitative retrospective case-control design, 50 women were recruited and assigned to the two groups evenly. Demographic data and risk factors were assessed using a questionnaire, and data were analyzed using SPSS version 27 at a 95% confidence interval and presented in tables and figures.

Results: Fifty-eight percent of the participants were aged 35 years and above, with 38% reporting a parity of 1-3. Logistic regression revealed that parity (odds ratio (OR) = 10.975, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.887-135.861, and p-value = 0.062), the interval between the last and present pregnancies (OR = 0.056, 95% CI = 0.005-0.668, p-value = 0.023), intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) use in the last year (OR = 0.070, 95% CI = 0.006 -0.780, p-value = 0.031) were statistically significant in predicting cesarean scar pregnancy. Combined methotrexate and aspiration were the most prevalent treatment options for scar site pregnancy in this study.

Conclusion: Scar site pregnancy is a maternal health complication that affects women across all healthcare settings, and its prevalence is not clear due to underdiagnosis and underreporting. The risk of scar site pregnancy increased with an increase in the number of childbirths (parity) and the interval between the last and current pregnancies.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Scar (MESH:D002921), maternal health complication (MESH:D011248)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11364361/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11364361/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11364361