Comparison of Post-Vaccination Response (Humoral and Cellular) to BNT162b2 in Clinical Cases, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Recipient with Immunocompetent Subjects over Almost Two Years of Parallel Monitoring
Jaroslaw Walory, Iza Ksiazek, Karolina Wegrzynska, Anna Baraniak

TL;DR
This study compares the immune response to the BNT162b2 vaccine in transplant recipients and healthy individuals over two years, finding that transplant recipients need booster doses for adequate protection.
Contribution
The study provides long-term comparative data on humoral and cellular vaccine responses in transplant recipients versus immunocompetent individuals.
Findings
Transplant recipients showed lower antibody levels after primary vaccination compared to immunocompetent individuals.
A booster dose was needed for transplant recipients to reach antibody levels similar to the control group after baseline vaccination.
Transplant recipients did not achieve a positive cellular immune response during the monitoring period.
Abstract
Background: Vaccination is one of the most effective medical interventions to prevent infectious diseases. The introduction of vaccines against coronavirus acute respiratory syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was aimed at preventing severe illness and death due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at high risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and serious effects associated with COVID-19, mainly due to the use of immunosuppressive therapies, which further cause suboptimal response to COVID-19 vaccination. Aim of the study: We aimed to compare post-vaccination response to BNT162b2 in kidney–pancreas transplant recipient, specifically in immunocompetent individuals, over two years of simultaneous monitoring. Methods: To determine the humoral response, the levels of the IgG and IgA anti-S1 antibodies were measured. To assess the cellular response to…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research · COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies · Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
