# Testing Protocol Development for the Fracture Toughness of Parts Built with Big Area Additive Manufacturing

## TL;DR

This paper develops a new testing method to measure the fracture toughness of large-scale 3D printed parts, addressing the lack of standards for additive manufacturing.

## Contribution

A modernized testing protocol using Digital Image Correlation for accurate, automated fracture toughness evaluation of BAAM-printed parts.

## Key findings

- Mode I DCB testing was performed on BAAM-printed thermoplastic matrix composites.
- Notch shape and deflection speed significantly affect fracture toughness results.
- Digital Image Correlation enabled simultaneous, automated data collection of displacement and load.

## Abstract

The mechanical testing of additively manufactured parts has largely relied on the existing standards developed for traditional manufacturing. While this approach leverages the investment made in current standards development, it inaccurately assumes that the mechanical response of additive manufacturing (AM) parts is identical to that of parts manufactured through traditional processes. When considering thermoplastic, material extrusion AM, the differences in response can be attributed to an AM part’s inherent inhomogeneity caused by porosity, interlayer zones, and surface texture. Additionally, the interlayer bonding of parts printed with large-scale AM is difficult to adequately assess, as much testing is performed such that stress is distributed across many layer interfaces; therefore, the lack of AM-specific standards to assess interlayer bonding is a significant research gap. To quantify interlayer bonding via fracture toughness, double cantilever beam (DCB) testing has been used for some AM materials, and DCB has been generally used for a variety of materials including metal, wood, and laminates. Mode I DCB testing was performed on thermoplastic matrix composites printed with Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM). Of particular interest was the notch shape and deflection speed during testing. The results examine the differences when using two notch types and three deflection speeds. The testing method introduced by the following paper differentiates itself from the ones described in the standards used by modernizing the methodology. This was conducted with the introduction of Digital Image Correlation (DIC) to gather displacement and load data simultaneously without human intervention.