# Phylogenetic Network Analyses Reveal the Influence of Transmission Clustering on the Spread of HIV Drug Resistance in Quebec from 2002 to 2022

**Authors:** Bluma G. Brenner, Ruxandra-Ilinca Ibanescu, Maureen Oliveira, Guillaume Margaillan, Bertrand Lebouché, Réjean Thomas, Jean Guy Baril, René-Pierre Lorgeoux, Michel Roger, Jean-Pierre Routy

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/v16081230 · Viruses · 2024-07-31

## TL;DR

This study shows that HIV drug resistance spreads through social networks in Quebec, highlighting the need for better prevention strategies.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates how transmission clustering influences the spread of HIV drug resistance using phylogenetic network analyses.

## Key findings

- Transmission clustering significantly contributes to the spread of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and thymidine analogue mutations.
- Despite declining treatment failure, transmitted drug resistance remains at 14% among newly infected individuals.
- Viral replicative fitness correlates with levels of transmitted drug resistance.

## Abstract

Background: HIV drug resistance (HIV-DR) may jeopardize the benefit of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in treatment and prevention. This study utilized viral phylogenetics to resolve the influence of transmission networks on sustaining the spread of HIV-DR in Quebec spanning 2002 to 2022. Methods: Time trends in acquired (ADR) and transmitted drug resistance (TDR) were delineated in treatment-experienced (n = 3500) and ART-naïve persons (n = 6011) with subtype B infections. Similarly, non-B-subtype HIV-DR networks were assessed pre- (n = 1577) and post-ART experience (n = 488). Risks of acquisition of resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were related to clustering using 1, 2–5, vs. 6+ members per cluster as categorical variables. Results: Despite steady declines in treatment failure and ADR since 2007, rates of TDR among newly infected, ART-naive persons remained at 14% spanning the 2007–2011, 2012–2016, and 2017–2022 periods. Notably, half of new infections among men having sex with men and heterosexual groups were linked in large, clustered networks having a median of 35 (14–73 IQR) and 16 (9–26 IQR) members per cluster, respectively. Cluster membership and size were implicated in forward transmission of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor NNRTI RAMs (9%) and thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) (5%). In contrast, transmission of M184V, K65R, and integrase inhibitors (1–2%) remained rare. Levels of TDR reflected viral replicative fitness. The median baseline viremia in ART-naïve groups having no RAMs, NNRTI RAMs, TAMs, and M184VI were 46.088, 38,447, 20,330, and 6811 copies/mL, respectively (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Phylogenetics emphasize the need to prioritize ART and pre-exposure prophylaxis strategies to avert the expansion of transmission cascades of HIV-DR.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** infected (MESH:D007239), viremia (MESH:D014766), HIV Drug Resistance (MESH:D000069279)
- **Chemicals:** thymidine (MESH:D013936), NNRTI (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]
- **Mutations:** M184V, K65R

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11359670/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11359670/full.md

## References

28 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11359670/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11359670