Towards the engagement of citizens in SOSTs decision-making: participatory models setting a common ground for border surveillance and respect of fundamental rights. Findings from ARESIBO H2020 project
Riccardo Laterza, Daniele Del Bianco, Ramona Velea, Olivia Ferrari, Lorenzo De Sabbata, Ezio Benedetti, Jernej Letnar Černič, Andres De Castro García, Andrew W Neal, Bartosz Czepil, Wojciech Opioła

TL;DR
This paper discusses how involving citizens and civil society organizations can help balance border security with respect for fundamental rights.
Contribution
The paper introduces the ARESIBO Participatory Model (APM) as a novel framework for citizen engagement in border surveillance decisions.
Findings
The APM is designed to involve stakeholders in border surveillance decisions.
The model includes a framework, strategy, and action plan for participatory processes.
Initial applications of the model show promise for broader adoption.
Abstract
ARESIBO is an H2020 project aiming to improve the efficiency of border surveillance systems by providing the operational teams, as well as the tactical command and control level with accurate and comprehensive information related to border control by different perspectives. Human Rights Groups’ (HRGs) and Civil Society Organisations’ (CSOs) involvement and participation in decision making related Surveillance-Oriented Security Technologies (SOSTs) for border surveillance is considered as a key-factor to ensure the coexistence of two only apparently opposite needs: security and respect of fundamental rights (i.e., privacy, refugees etc.). Starting from this general approach, the paper represents the second part of a research diptych dedicated to present the main achievements and methods proposed by ARESIBO to enhance participation in border surveillance. It outlines the ARESIBO…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSex work and related issues
