Computational and ADMET Predictions of Novel Compounds as Dual Inhibitors of BuChE and GSK-3β to Combat Alzheimer’s Disease
Saurabh G. Londhe, Vinayak Walhekar, Mangala Shenoy, Suvarna G. Kini, Marcus T. Scotti, Luciana Scotti, Dileep Kumar

TL;DR
This paper designs new compounds that can inhibit two enzymes linked to Alzheimer's disease, showing promising results in computer simulations.
Contribution
The study introduces novel dual inhibitors of GSK-3β and BuChE, designed by fusing tacrine and amantadine ureido analogs.
Findings
Compounds DKS1 and DKS4 showed strong interactions with key amino acids in GSK-3β and BuChE with docking energies of −9.6 and −12.3 kcal/mol.
Molecular dynamics simulations confirmed the stability of DKS1 and DKS4 in enzyme active sites over 100 ns.
DKS5 demonstrated a high human oral absorption rate of 79.792%, outperforming other compounds in the study.
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer’s disease is a serious and widespread neurodegenerative illness in the modern healthcare scenario. GSK-3β and BuChE are prominent enzymatic targets associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Co-targeting GSK3β and BChE in Alzheimer’s disease helps to modify disease progression and enhance cognitive function by addressing both tau pathology and cholinergic deficits. However, the treatment arsenal for Alzheimer’s disease is extremely inadequate, with present medications displaying dismal success in treating this never-ending ailment. To create novel dual inhibitors, we have used molecular docking and dynamics analysis. Our focus was on analogs formed from the fusion of tacrine and amantadine ureido, specifically tailored to target GSK-3β and BuChE. Methods: In the following study, molecular docking was executed by employing AutoDock Vina and molecular dynamics and ADMET…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClassical Studies and Legal History · American Constitutional Law and Politics · War, Ethics, and Justification
