# Social–Emotional Profiles of Preschool Children: An Investigation of Demographic Disparities and Intersectionality

## TL;DR

This study explores social-emotional development in preschool children, focusing on disparities and overlapping factors like race, age, and disability in low-income populations.

## Contribution

The study introduces a person-centered approach to identify distinct social-emotional profiles and reveals intersectional disparities in underserved preschoolers.

## Key findings

- Four social-emotional profiles were identified: Adaptive, Average, Moderate Risk, and High Risk.
- Demographic disparities and intersectionality among race/ethnicity, age, and disability status were found in social-emotional profiles.
- Findings highlight the need for tailored support for children in low-resource environments.

## Abstract

This study aims to enhance our understanding of the diverse nature of social–emotional development and explore the demographic disparities and intersectionality of social determinants among children, with an emphasis on underserved populations of children in low-resource environments. Young children living in low-income families are exposed to a wide array of social and systemic risks that increase the propensity for poor learning and social–emotional development. Using data from the Head Start Family and Childhood Experiences Survey (FACES, this study focuses on the social–emotional development of a nationally representative sample of young children enrolled in the Head Start program (n = 1921, 50.18% male). Employing a person-centered approach, we assessed teacher-rated social–emotional competence, including approach to learning, social cooperation, aggression, hyperactivity, and anxiety/depression/withdrawal, to classify young children’s social–emotional development. This study identified four distinct social–emotional profiles—Adaptive, Average, Moderate Risk, and High Risk—through latent profile analysis. Furthermore, multinomial regression analysis revealed demographic disparities within each social–emotional profile, and significant intersectionality was found between race/ethnicity, age, and disability status in the social–emotional profiles. This research provides valuable insights for better supporting each child’s unique needs.