Integrating Signaling Pathways with Transcription Factor Networks—On the Trail of Sisyphus?
Kostas A. Papavassiliou, Athanasios G. Papavassiliou

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks · 14-3-3 protein interactions · RNA Research and Splicing
In the context of health and disease research, cells use signaling pathways that transduce stimuli from the extracellular environment to modulate intracellular gene expression via the activity of transcription factors and cofactors (coactivators and/or corepressors). Upstream signaling can either potentiate or inhibit transcription factors, primarily through post-translational modifications (mainly phosphorylation), changes in localization (e.g., the masking of nuclear localization signal(s) and cytoplasmic retention by binding to an anchoring protein), alterations in their transcription/translation, or by modifying their ability to access their target genes in an epigenetic manner [1]. A few examples of signaling cascades leading to the upregulation or downregulation of transcription factors are Janus kinase (JAK) signaling, which activates members of the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) family of transcription factors [2]; transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling, which leads to the activation of the suppressor of mother against decapentaplegic (SMAD) family of transcription factors [3]; Hippo signaling, which targets the TEA domain-containing (TEAD) family of transcription factors [4]; and Wingless-related integration site (WNT) signaling, which induces the activation of β-catenin [5].
Under normal conditions, this intricate molecular process that begins from the cell membrane, continues with intracellular signaling pathways, and ends with transcription factor-dependent gene regulation, allowing cells to acquire and maintain their identity, as well as respond to their dynamic extracellular environment. In the context of disease, abnormal signaling and transcription factor function result in aberrant gene regulation and pathological cell phenotypes. Undoubtedly, signaling pathways and transcription factors are interconnected and should be studied in concert to better understand cellular physiology and pathophysiology. Yet, deciphering the interplay between cell signaling and transcription-factor-mediated gene control still remains a challenge because it is affected by multiple factors and is context-dependent.
In order to draw a full picture of the complex crosstalk between signaling pathways and transcription factors, several recent studies have used comprehensive approaches that integrate multi-omics data, including genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, phosphoproteomics, and metabolomics. These systematic multi-omics studies have brought new insights into the interaction between signaling pathways and transcription factor networks that advance the current knowledge on the gene regulatory landscape. Importantly, multi-omics data reveal biologically and clinically relevant mechanisms, therapeutic targets, and biomarkers that can be leveraged in the clinic for patient stratification and treatment. For example, Mun et al. recently conducted a study whereby proteomics and post-translational modification data were integrated with transcriptional profiling, uncovering the molecular heterogeneity of early-onset gastric cancer [6]. In another study, Wang et al. reported a multi-omics method based on interactions among proteomics, phosphoproteomics, and transcriptomics that identified numerous oncogenic drivers, including kinases and transcription factors, in glioma [7]. In the research field of early human development, Alanis-Lobato et al. provided a multi-omics approach to predict gene regulatory networks in early human embryos [8]. In the context of human physiology, Yan et al. generated multi-omics data related to transcriptional regulation in response to high-altitude hypoxia [9]. Additionally, a study by Li et al. developed a multi-omics method to unravel the gene expression networks associated with the transcription factor activator protein 1 (AP-1) [10]. In a recent study by He et al., an integrative analysis of multi-omics data unveiled a drug-resistance mechanism involving the transcription factor Rb in hepatocellular carcinoma [11]. Similarly, using muti-omics profiling, Lu et al. discovered key signaling pathways that are modulated by the transcription factor STAT3 in ovarian cancer [12]. These studies, along with several others, underline the important knowledge that can be uncovered by integrating data from multiple molecular layers.
For a dynamic relationship between signaling cascades and transcription factor networks to develop in a biological system, we must be aware of all aspects of -omics since genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, and proteomics are deeply interconnected. With the aid of artificial intelligence (AI), comprehensive multi-omics data analyses will revolutionize our understanding of cell signaling and gene regulation in both healthy and diseased states.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Calkhoven C.F. Ab G. Multiple steps in the regulation of transcription-factor level and activity Biochem. J.1996317 Pt 232934210.1042/bj 31703298713055 PMC 1217492 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Hu X. Li J. Fu M. Zhao X. Wang W. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: From bench to clinic Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.2021640210.1038/s 41392-021-00791-134824210 PMC 8617206 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Tzavlaki K. Moustakas A. TGF-β Signaling Biomolecules 20201048710.3390/biom 1003048732210029 PMC 7175140 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Fu M. Hu Y. Lan T. Guan K.L. Luo T. Luo M. Correction: The Hippo signalling pathway and its implications in human health and diseases Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.20249510.1038/s 41392-023-01682-338172156 PMC 10764337 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Liu J. Xiao Q. Xiao J. Niu C. Li Y. Zhang X. Zhou Z. Shu G. Yin G. Wnt/β-catenin signalling: Function, biological mechanisms, and therapeutic opportunities Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.20227310.1038/s 41392-021-00762-634980884 PMC 8724284 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Mun D.G. Bhin J. Kim S. Kim H. Jung J.H. Jung Y. Jang Y.E. Park J.M. Kim H. Jung Y. Proteogenomic Characterization of Human Early-Onset Gastric Cancer Cancer Cell 201935111124.e 1010.1016/j.ccell.2018.12.00330645970 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Wang H. Diaz A.K. Shaw T.I. Li Y. Niu M. Cho J.H. Paugh B.S. Zhang Y. Sifford J. Bai B. Deep multiomics profiling of brain tumors identifies signaling networks downstream of cancer driver genes Nat. Commun.201910371810.1038/s 41467-019-11661-431420543 PMC 6697699 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Alanis-Lobato G. Bartlett T.E. Huang Q. Simon C.S. Mc Carthy A. Elder K. Snell P. Christie L. Niakan K.K. MICA: A multi-omics method to predict gene regulatory networks in early human embryos Life Sci. Alliance 20237 e 20230241510.26508/lsa.20230241537879938 PMC 10599980 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
