# The Sexual Double Standard toward Non-Heterosexual Populations: Evaluations of Sexually Active Gay Men and Lesbian Women

**Authors:** Michael Marks, Serina Padgett

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/bs14080706 · Behavioral Sciences · 2024-08-13

## TL;DR

The study explores how people judge gay men and lesbian women based on their sexual activity and gender traits.

## Contribution

The research reveals a reversed sexual double standard influenced by gender role expectations for non-heterosexual populations.

## Key findings

- Highly sexually active lesbian women were liked more by masculine participants.
- Highly sexually active gay men were rated as the least moral.
- Masculinity in participants influenced evaluations of gay men and lesbian women.

## Abstract

We examined the sexual double standard (SDS) toward sexually active gay men and lesbian women and the role that participants’ masculinity and femininity played in their evaluations. We hypothesized that there would be a reverse SDS in which highly sexually active lesbian women would be evaluated positively and highly sexually active gay men negatively, with both being evaluated more negatively than less sexually active gay men and lesbians. We also hypothesized that masculinity would moderate this effect, with participant masculinity being positively related to stronger negative evaluations of highly sexually active gay targets and more positive evaluations of highly sexually active lesbian targets. Results indicate a weak SDS in the areas of likability and morality, with highly sexually active lesbians being liked by masculine participants the most and highly sexually active gay men being rated as the least moral. The SDS appears to be influenced by expectations of gender roles and may be reversed for gay men and lesbian women because of these expectations.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11351331/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11351331/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11351331/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11351331