# How do implants overlying the spine influence “The Law of Diminishing Returns” in early-onset scoliosis patients?

## TL;DR

This study explores how the placement of spinal implants affects curve correction and spinal growth in children with early-onset scoliosis.

## Contribution

The study introduces a grading system to assess implant placement and its correlation with clinical outcomes in early-onset scoliosis.

## Key findings

- Higher overlap grades of convex-sided rods with the spine correlated with better curve correction.
- Greater spinal height gains were observed with increased rod overlap.
- Regression models confirmed the significance of overlap grade after controlling for other variables.

## Abstract

The “law of diminishing returns” (LODR) in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is well-known. We hypothesized that previously observed variations between constructs may be related to the lateral distance that each construct lies from the spine. We therefore sought to determine whether the curve magnitude improvement and spinal length gains for distraction-based constructs in EOS are positively correlated with the collinearity of the spine and the convex-sided implant on posteroanterior radiographs.

A prospectively-collected, multicenter EOS registry was queried for all patients who underwent non-fusion, distraction-based instrumentation surgery. Post-index radiographs were graded from 1 to 5 based on amount of overlap between the convex-sided rod and the apical vertebra. Grade 1: convex rod is lateral to convex-sided pedicle; Grade 2: overlaps the convex-sided pedicle; Grade 3: lies between pedicles; Grade 4: overlaps concave-sided pedicle; Grade 5: medial to concave-sided pedicle. ANOVA assessed the correlations between post-index overlap grade and change in (a) curve magnitude and (b) T1–T12 height. Multivariable regression modeling further assessed these associations.

284 patients met all selection criteria and were included. On ANOVA, post-index grade was associated with curve magnitude (p <0.001) and T1-12 height (p = 0.028) change. Better curve correction and height change were associated with higher grade. On regression modeling, curve correction (R = 0.574) and T1–T12 height change (R = 0.339) remained significantly associated with grade when controlling for time, anchor locations, age, underlying diagnosis, and pre-index curve magnitude.

More apical overlap by the convex rod was associated with better spinal deformity control and improved height gain.

Therapeutic.