# Identifying Care Gaps and Referral Patterns in Acute Dermatology at Urgent Care Centers

## TL;DR

This study examines how patients with acute dermatology issues are treated at urgent care centers and how they are referred to a university hospital, finding gaps in care and referral efficiency.

## Contribution

The study identifies referral patterns and care gaps in acute dermatology at urgent care centers and evaluates the feasibility of using eConsult for referrals.

## Key findings

- Most patients referred from urgent care centers did not complete an in-person dermatology evaluation.
- Only 56% of diagnoses matched between urgent care centers and the university hospital.
- The majority of referrals were deemed suitable for eConsult rather than in-person visits.

## Abstract

Limited urgent access to board-certified dermatologists drives patients to seek dermatologic care at urgent care centers (UCC). UCC are staffed by clinicians with comparatively limited dermatology training, often resulting in lower quality care for acute dermatology conditions. This study investigates health care referral outcomes of patients seeking dermatologic care at UCC, examine the appropriateness of UCC dermatologic care, and assess the feasibility of referral management by eConsult. We utilize a retrospective cohort of 807 patients and a provider survey to examine referral outcomes of patients referred to University of Rochester Dermatology (UR-Derm), a tertiary care university-based teaching hospital, from UR UCC between January 1, 2021, and August 31, 2022.
Outcomes for healthcare referrals included patient demographics,
referral completion rates, UR-Derm appointment wait times, and diagnostic concordance rates between UCC and UR-Derm. Outcomes from the provider survey included appropriateness of UCC treatment plans, appropriateness of UCC referral to UR-Derm, and feasibility of referral management by eConsult. Patients who utilized UCC were predominately white (77.0%) females (53.9%) with a mean age of 37.9 years. Most patients referred by UCC did not complete an in-person UR-Derm evaluation (58.6%). Of those who did complete a UR-Derm visit, the average wait time was 38.3 days. Only 56% of UCC and UR-Derm diagnoses were concordant. Our surveyed dermatologists deemed 30% of the UCC treatment plans appropriate. The majority of referrals (83.5%) were viewed as manageable with an eConsult with only 10% of referrals requiring in-person visit. Several practice gaps exist in specialty care delivery in UCC and additional inefficiencies exist in the urgent referral process. These gaps could be addressed by targeted educational interventions and availability of dermatology consultation to support urgent care.