Correction to: Mathematical models of neuronal growth
Hadrien Oliveri, Alain Goriely

TL;DR
This paper corrects a previously published article on mathematical models of neuronal growth.
Contribution
The paper provides corrections to the original publication to ensure accuracy.
Findings
Errors in the original paper have been identified and corrected.
The corrections are necessary for the integrity of the published research.
Abstract
Correction to: Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology (2022) 21:89–118 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01539-0
- —Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics (2)
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCellular Mechanics and Interactions · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
We report some minor errors in the article titled “Mathematical models of neuronal growth” by Hadrien Oliveri and Alain Goriely, published in Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology on 7 July 2022 (Oliveri and Goriely 2022):
- Equation (4) should be replaced by:
This adjustment ensures that \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k^-$$\end{document} has the dimension of a concentration per unit time, while \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k^+$$\end{document} has the dimension of an inverse time. This is consistent with Equation (2), where we introduced the parameter e with dimension of time per concentration. 2. On page 92, a proper nondimensionalisation can be achieved by introducing the respective time, length, and concentration units A/D, SAe/VD, and SA/VD (correcting the initially chosen length unit). This revised nondimensionalisation introduces the dimensionless parameters \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\alpha = A D / Se$$\end{document} , \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\beta = V k^-/S$$\end{document} , and \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma = Ak^+/D$$\end{document} . It is important to note that this correction does not affect the nondimensionalised equations or the results depicted in the figures for given values of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\alpha$$\end{document} , \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\beta$$\end{document} , and \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma$$\end{document} . 3. The following statement “It is well known that there is no physical (positive) solution to the diffusion equation in one or two dimensions” should be corrected to read “There is no physical (positive) steady solution to the diffusion equation with a constant point source in one and two dimensions”.
