# Accelerated Radiotherapy Alone Versus Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Carcinoma Cervix: Long-Term Outcomes

## TL;DR

This study compares the long-term outcomes of accelerated radiotherapy and chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer, finding similar survival rates but fewer side effects with accelerated radiotherapy.

## Contribution

The study provides long-term evidence that accelerated radiotherapy is a viable alternative to chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer.

## Key findings

- Accelerated radiotherapy showed similar five-year survival rates as chemoradiation.
- Patients receiving accelerated radiotherapy experienced fewer high-grade acute toxicities.
- There was no significant difference in recurrence rates between the two treatment groups.

## Abstract

Introduction

Chemoradiation (CRT) is the standard of care for the treatment of carcinoma cervix, more benefits of CRT are seen in the early stage as compared to a locally advanced stage. Altered fractionation such as accelerated radiotherapy (ART) in locally advanced carcinoma cervix has not been explored much. Here, we have reported the long-term outcome of ART in comparison to conventional CRT in locally advanced cervical cancer patients.

Methods

From September 2011 to January 2014, 191 patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix, FIGO stage IIB - IIIB were included in this study. They were randomized into two arms: the CRT arm (95 patients) versus the ART arm (96 patients). During external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), the patients in the CRT arm received conventional radiotherapy 50 Gy/25 fractions, 2 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week with cisplatin 40 mg/m2/week while patients in the ART arm received 50 Gy/25 fractions, 2 Gy/fraction, 6 fractions per week (Monday to Saturday) radiation alone. This was followed by three insertions of 6.5 Gy per fraction of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy at one-week intervals in both arms to keep the total treatment time 50 days in the CRT arm versus 45 days in the ART arm.

Results

The median follow-up of the study population was 57 months (range: 4-108 months). The patients with no residual disease (NRD) after EBRT and complete response (CR) at first follow-up were statistically less in the ART arm as compared to the CRT arm (30.2% versus 53.7% and 42.7% versus 63.2%; p = 0.006 and p = 0.024, respectively). However, there was no statistical difference in response at six months. High-grade acute toxicities hematological (9.5%) and gastrointestinal (15.8%) were more prevalent in the CRT arm in comparison to the ART arm, with no statistical significance (p>0.05) and Grade 1/2 genitourinary toxicity was significantly higher in the CRT arm. Late toxicities in both groups were equivalent. Recurrence, distant type of recurrence, and time to recurrence were similar in both groups. Five-year rates of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 51.2% versus 37.2% (p = 0.087) and 57.1% versus 46.3% (p = 0.223) in the CRT arm versus ART arm, respectively.

Conclusion

ART is a compelling alternative to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer, particularly in patients with significant comorbidities, elderly women, and those in higher stages where concurrent chemotherapy's efficacy diminishes. It should be strongly considered when chemotherapy is contraindicated.