# MRI paraspinous skeletal muscle enhancement: A potential imaging biomarker for assessing clinical liver cirrhosis severity

## TL;DR

This study explores how MRI scans of muscles near the spine can help assess the severity of liver cirrhosis.

## Contribution

The study introduces MRI paraspinous muscle enhancement as a potential biomarker for liver cirrhosis severity.

## Key findings

- PSM CEFR-ART is lower in patients with severe cirrhosis indicators like MELD>17 and varices.
- PSM CEFR-PV correlates with albumin and MELD, suggesting a link to liver function.
- PSM SMI is reduced in patients with ascites and variceal bleed history.

## Abstract

To evaluate for correlation between MRI paraspinous muscle (PSM) enhancement and clinical measures of cirrhosis severity (CMCS) utilizing established imaging biomarkers of sarcopenia as comparison.

Retrospective evaluation of 224 patients (mean age 59.6± 9.7 years, 135 males and 89 females) with liver cirrhosis who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI between August 2021 and August 2022 was performed. Assessed variables included: body mass index (BMI), varices and ascites present on imaging (VPI and API), albumin, total bilirubin (Tbili), international normalized ratio (INR), creatinine, MELD score, as well as history of paracentesis (PH), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and variceal bleed (VBH). These variables were compared to PSM skeletal muscle index (SMI), PSM signal fat fractions (sFF), and PSM contrast enhancement fraction (CEFR) calculated on arterial (CEFR-ART), portal venous (CEFR-PV), and delayed (CEFR-DEL) phases collected on MRI.

Patients with MELD>17, PH, and VPI had lower PSM CEFR-ART (0.06vs. 0.11, p = 0.01; 0.07vs. 0.11, p = 0.01; and 0.09vs. 0.13, p = 0.03, respectively). PSM CEFR-ART correlated negatively with MELD. Patients with MELD>17 and PH had lower PSM CEFR-PV (0.16vs. 0.23, p = 0.02; 0.18 vs. 0.23, p = 0.01, respectively). PSM CEFR-PV correlated positively with albumin and negatively with Tbili, INR, and MELD. PSM CEFR-DEL correlated negatively with Tbili and MELD. Patients with API, PH, and VBH had lower PSM SMI (4.68vs. 5.59, p<0.001; 4.37vs. 5.48, p<0.001; 4.78vs. 5.35, p = 0.04, respectively). PSM SMI correlated negatively with Tbili and positively with BMI. PSM sFF correlated positively with BMI, PSM CEFR-PV, and PSM CEFR-DEL.

PSM CEFR is significantly reduced on MRI in patients with clinical manifestations of severe liver cirrhosis. Further investigation into PSM CEFR’s usefulness as an imaging biomarker for evaluating liver disease severity is warranted.