# Seeing the Forest but Naming the Trees: An Object-Over-Place Bias in Learning Noun Labels

## TL;DR

This study explores how people prioritize learning object names over place names in language, similar to how drawings focus on objects rather than spaces.

## Contribution

The paper introduces evidence of an object-over-place bias in language learning, extending prior findings from drawings to linguistic contexts.

## Key findings

- Adults showed an object-over-place bias in labeling and matching tasks but not in prepositional extensions.
- Young children exhibited the object-over-place bias only in labeling tasks.
- The bias may develop similarly to other object-related learning biases like the shape bias.

## Abstract

Objects and places are foundational spatial domains represented in human symbolic expressions, like drawings, which show a prioritization of depicting small-scale object-shape information over the large-scale navigable place information in which objects are situated. Is there a similar object-over-place bias in language? Across six experiments, adults and 3- to 4-year-old children were asked either to extend a novel noun in a labeling phrase, to extend a novel noun in a prepositional phrase, or to simply match pictures. To dissociate specific object and place information from more general figure and ground information, participants either saw scenes with both place information (a room) and object information (a block in the room), or scenes with two kinds of object information that matched the figure-ground relations of the room and block by presenting an open container with a smaller block inside. While adults showed a specific object-over-place bias in both extending novel noun labels and matching, they did not show this bias in extending novel nouns following prepositions. Young children showed this bias in extending novel noun labels only. Spatial domains may thus confer specific and foundational biases for word learning that may change through development in a way that is similar to that of other word-learning biases about objects, like the shape bias. These results expand the symbolic scope of prior studies on object biases in drawing to object biases in language, and they expand the spatial domains of prior studies characterizing the language of objects and places.