Simulated medication administration for vulnerable populations using scanning technology: a quasi-experimental pilot study

TL;DR

This study tested using QR code scanning in nursing simulations to see if it reduces medication errors and better prepares students for real-world settings.

Contribution

A pilot intervention using low-cost QR scanning in nursing simulations to evaluate its impact on medication errors and student perceptions.

Findings

QR scanning did not significantly reduce medication errors compared to traditional methods.

Most students felt QR scanning better mimicked real clinical settings.

Half of the students believed QR scanning improved their safety practices.

Abstract

Medication errors may occur due to shortcuts and pressures on time and resources on nurses. Nursing students are enculturated into these environments where their perceptions of norms around reporting and responding to medication errors are formative, yet simulated medication administration experiences are rarely reflective of the real-world environment. such as the standard use of medication scanning technology. The purpose of the present study is to test a pilot intervention, Medication Quick Response (QR) code scanning, and evaluate its effect on medication errors during simulation when compared to traditional simulation medication administration practices and to assess the students’ perceptions of the intervention.

We conducted a quasi-experimental, observational study involving Junior and Senior (3rd and 4th year) undergraduate, pre-licensure nursing students from Spring 2022 until Fall 2023. Seven simulations were conducted in pediatric and obstetric courses. The intervention group used non-patented, low cost QR scanning during medication administration. The control group used standard manual administration. Medication errors were measured based on the quantity, type of error, and degree of patient risk. A Qualtrics survey was used to assess the students’ perceptions of the intervention following simulation participation.

A total of 166 students participated in the study. In each course, 7 groups were assigned to the intervention and 8 were assigned to the control. More than half of the groups made at least one medication error (n = 17), one-third of groups (n = 10) made a high-risk medication error. There was no statistically meaningful difference in the rate, type, or potential patient risk of medication errors between the intervention and control groups. The majority of participants (n = 53) felt that QR scanning more closely mimicked medication administration in clinical settings. Half of the participants responded that it improved their safety practices (n = 37).

The results of this pilot study indicate that while there is a high risk for error among pre-licensure nursing students, the use of QR scanning did not increase the risk of medication errors. The next study iteration will build upon these pilot findings to integrate the use of embedded medication errors, time management tasks, and a multi-site implementation.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-024-02248-6.