# Comparative study of the antibacterial effects of wound secretions of different cultivars of Chinese fir

**Authors:** Yu Jiang, Yalin Zeng, Jianing Zhu, Linjun Sun, Pengfei Wu, Ming Li, Xiangqing Ma

PMC · DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17850 · PeerJ · 2024-08-16

## TL;DR

This study examines how wound secretions from different Chinese fir tree cultivars affect bacteria, finding that their antibacterial effects depend on the chemical composition of the secretions.

## Contribution

The study reveals that antibacterial efficacy of Chinese fir wound secretions varies by cultivar and is driven by secretion composition, not quantity.

## Key findings

- Exudates from Chinese fir bark showed antibacterial effects against five bacterial species.
- Antibacterial efficacy varied among cultivars and was linked to secretion composition, not quantity.
- Organic acids and terpenoids were identified as potential contributors to antibacterial activity.

## Abstract

The bark of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata), the largest afforestation tree species in the forest areas of southern China, is susceptible to injuries and bites from small animals. The population of small animals has recently increased owing to improvements in the ecological environment across various forested areas, thus increasing the incidence of injuries in the bark of Chinese fir. Following such injuries, the bark secretes light yellow or milky white secretions, the function of which remains unclear. The present study aimed to reveal the antibacterial effect of exudates of different Chinese fir cultivars on five bacterial species.

The research involved three-year-old plantations of Taxus chinensis var. koraiensis and Yangkou3 and three-year-old container plantations of Taxus chinensis var. pendula, Yang 061, and Yang 020. The antibacterial effects of exudates were analyzed using the filter paper diffusion method. The minimum inhibitory concentration for each secretion and the bacterial inhibition zone were determined.

The exudates of the different Chinese fir bark exhibited notable antibacterial effects on Bacillus subtilis, Salmonella paratyphi B, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus. However, the extent of these antibacterial effects varied among the different Chinese fir cultivars, as the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the exudates against the five bacterial species varied. The mean MIC of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was lower potency, whereas that of Escherichia coli was the lowest. Notably, the antibacterial efficacy of the exudates was mainly influenced by the composition of the secretions rather than the number of secretions, with organic acid compounds and terpenoids potentially contributing to the antibacterial effects against E. coli and Bacillus subtilis, respectively.

This study demonstrates the antibacterial effect of wound secretion of different Chinese fir cultivars, highlighting their varying efficacy on different bacterial species. Moreover, the antibacterial ability of the exudates of the strains was mainly determined by the composition of the wound secretions, and there was no noticeable relationship with the number of wound secretions. The results of this study offers a theoretical basis for screen Chinese fir cultivars with high-disease-resistant.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Cunninghamia lanceolata (taxon 28977), Bacillus subtilis (taxon 1423), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (taxon 287), Escherichia coli (taxon 562), Staphylococcus aureus (taxon 1280)

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Pseudomonas aeruginosa (species) [taxon 287], Bacillus subtilis (species) [taxon 1423], Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Paratyphi B (no rank) [taxon 57045], Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562], Staphylococcus aureus (species) [taxon 1280], Cunninghamia lanceolata (China fir, species) [taxon 28977]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11332385/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11332385/full.md

## References

41 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11332385/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11332385