Social psychology: Spotting social faux pas with AI
Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos, Julian Tejada

TL;DR
AI can detect social norm violations in text and identify which norm was broken, helping with cross-cultural interactions.
Contribution
AI can now detect and classify specific social norm violations in text.
Findings
AI models can identify social norm violations in text.
AI can distinguish the specific norm that was violated.
This capability supports cross-cultural interactions.
Abstract
New research demonstrates AI, in the form of natural language models, can identify social norm violations in text and correctly distinguish the specific violated norm. This shows AI’s potential to recognize tricky social faux pas and support cross-cultural interactions.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Yori Designs on Pixabay
Large language models (LLMs) are the latest artificial intelligence (AI) technology making inroads into understanding psychological phenomena. These models analyse and extract language patterns from vast amounts of text data to generate responses. One particularly interesting question is whether LLMs can appropriately recognize and handle social norms. While some social norms are universal, many are context-dependent, and it is precisely these context-dependent norms that pose the greatest difficulty in algorithmic processing, raising the question: can LLMs identify appropriate behaviours within specific social contexts.
In a new study, Yair Neuman and colleagues at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev tested whether an LLM, which was not trained to identify social norms, could classify 25 short scenarios used to measure social emotion, finding a surprising performance of 16 scenarios correctly classified^1^. They also asked the LLM to judge if a set of 8352 scenarios from a dataset of one-to-one conversations in which the speaker talks about personal feelings were examples of norm adherence or norm violation; the LLMs were better at classifying positive social emotions (e.g., pride) than negative (e.g., guilt). The researchers then identified which norm-breaking situations the model could identify and found that examples of breaking social norms of trust, caring, loyalty and conformity were best classified by the models.
This study highlights the potential of combining psychological theory with LLM to develop interpretable algorithms that can generalize social norm recognition across languages and cultures. Social cognitive scientists now have a new tool to unravel the complexities of social faux pas that transcend cultural boundaries.
