# Early Complications of Planned Resection Versus Unplanned Excision of Sarcomas in the Distal Upper Extremity

**Authors:** Seth Ahlquist, Kevin Y. Chen, Eric Chang, Scott D. Nelson, Nicholas M. Bernthal, Lauren E. Wessel

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.04.010 · Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online · 2024-05-18

## TL;DR

Unplanned removal of sarcomas in the hand and wrist area leads to higher complications and worse outcomes compared to planned surgeries.

## Contribution

This study compares the outcomes of planned versus unplanned sarcoma excisions in the distal upper extremity, highlighting the importance of proper preoperative evaluation.

## Key findings

- Unplanned excisions had a 96.4% rate of positive surgical margins and were more likely to require re-excision.
- Patients with unplanned excisions experienced more complications, including amputation and systemic therapy, compared to those with planned excisions.
- Nearly half of unplanned excision patients developed local recurrence or metastatic disease.

## Abstract

Unplanned excisions are defined as excisions of malignant tumors performed without preoperative cross-sectional imaging or diagnostic biopsy, frequently resulting in residual disease and re-excision secondary to positive surgical margins. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative morbidity of planned versus unplanned upper-extremity sarcoma excisions.

A single tertiary referral hospital pathology database was queried from January 2015 through 2022 for primary upper-extremity sarcomas (forearm, wrist, hand, and finger). Demographics, tumor features, survival characteristics, and outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.

Forty-two upper-extremity sarcoma patients were identified, two-thirds of whom had unplanned excisions. Those with unplanned excisions were more likely to be female (relative risk [RR]: 1.9; P = .002), undergo initial excision at a nonsarcoma center (RR: 14.0; P < .001), have masses distal to the forearm (RR: 1.6; P = .02), and have smaller masses (4.8 vs 7.4 cm, P = .03). 71.4% of tumors were high grade, and 60.7% less than 5 cm in size.

Unplanned excisions had positive margins in 96.4% of cases and were more likely to undergo re-excision (odds ratio [OR]: 20.0; P = .001), more total resections (2.7 vs 1.4, P = .009), sacrifice of neurovascular structures (OR: 6.1; P = .04), adjuvant radiation therapy (OR: 4.5; P = .05), adjuvant systemic therapy (OR: 10.9; P = .03), or experience a complication (OR: 17.6; P = .002) at an average of 38.0 months of follow-up.

Nearly half of all unplanned excision patients developed a local recurrence or metastatic disease. Six patients required an amputation versus one in the planned cohort (P = .17), and 26.5% of patients died at an average of 32.5 months from presentation.

Distal upper-extremity sarcoma excisions are frequently unplanned, with high rates of morbidity compared with planned excisions. Surgeons should have a low threshold for cross-sectional imaging and core needle biopsy of atypical lesions, irrespective of size, with referral to a sarcoma center.

Prognostic IV.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** masses (MESH:C536030), Sarcomas (MESH:D012509), malignant tumors (MESH:D009369), metastatic disease (MESH:D000092182), died (MESH:D003643)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11331227/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11331227/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11331227