Correction to Determining the temporal, dose, and composition effects of nutritional substrates in an in vitro model of intrahepatocellular triglyceride accumulation
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Shilpa R Nagarajan, Eloise Cross, Elspeth Johnson, Fabio Sanna, Lorna J Daniels, David W Ray, Leanne Hodson. Determining the temporal, dose, and composition effects of nutritional substrates in an in vitro model of intrahepatocellular triglyceride accumulation. Physiol Rep. 2022 Oct;10(20):e15463. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15463.
In the published paper, the units in Figure 2D of μmoles TG/mg protein and 3H of μmoles /mg protein were incorrect. These should have read nmoles TG/ mg protein for Figure 2D and mmoles / mg protein for Figure 3H.
There was also an omission in the legends of Figures 2 and 3, as it was not stated what the symbols on above the bars represented for the statistical analysis comparison. For Figure 2, the legend should have had included: For figures a, c, e, g, and i: a = p < 0.05 compared to control; b = p < 0.05 compared to low fat (within same FA condition); and c = p < 0.05 compared to OPLA (within same FA concentration) and for figures b, d, f, h, and j: a = p < 0.05 compared to 100 nM glucagon (within same FA condition); b = p < 0.05 compared to 0 nM insulin (within same FA condition); c = p < 0.05 compared to 10 nM insulin (within same FA condition); d = p < 0.05 compared to 2 days (within same FA and hormone condition); and e = p < 0.05 compared to OPLA (within same hormone condition and day).
For Figure 3, the legend should have included the following: For figures a, c, e, and g: a = p < 0.05 compared to control; b = p < 0.05 compared to low fat (within same FA condition); and c = p < 0.05 compared to OPLA (within same FA concentration) and for figures b, d, f, and h: a = p < 0.05 compared to 100 nM glucagon (within same FA condition); b = p < 0.05 compared to 0 nM insulin (within same FA condition); c = p < 0.05 compared to 10 nM insulin (within same FA condition); d = p < 0.05 compared to 2 days (within same FA and hormone condition); and e = p < 0.05 compared to OPLA (within same hormone condition and day).
We apologize for these errors. The corrections do not affect the interpretation of the results.