Correction to: Does orthognathic surgery affect mandibular condyle position? A retrospective study
Bronislava Dvoranova, Michal Vavro, Ladislav Czako, Dusan Hirjak
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTemporomandibular Joint Disorders · Medical and Biological Sciences · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Correction to: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2023)
10.1007/s10006-023-01181-3
The original article contains a numerical error in Table 2. Corrected Table 2 provided: ParameterAdvancement Group Average Change (43 patients)Setback Group Average Change (56 patients)P valueCCL−0,565−0,0910,298289CCR0,5810,2250,367259ABL−0,598−4,2410,011326ABR−5,765−3,7540,169629EDL−0,026−0,1050,74881EDR−0,1200,2520,295643FDL0,0440,0230,963936FDR−0,3330,7200,005795
Also, because of the numerical error, there has been a misinterpretation of the results. Hence, in the Abstract and Results section, the results are as following:
In Abstract:
Results: CT condylar position measurements indicated significant postoperative changes in AB angle bilaterally (p = <0,001). In mandibular advancement and setback comparison, values were significantly lower in ABL angle values in setback group (p = 0,011326), and significantly lower in FDR in advancement group (p=0,005795). There were no statistically significant changes found in BSSO and bimaxillary group comparison.
In Results:
There was also a difference in FDR value changes – in advancement group, the values were significantly lower (p = 0,005795) (Table 2).
In Discussion:
In this study, the results showed significant changes in pre- and postoperative values in AB angle, which represents condylar rotation in the transversal axis. This change was even more apparent in mandibular setback group, where the values showed a significant decrease, indicating medial condylar rotation. Lower FDR values in advancement group indicate a more posterior postoperative condylar position in comparison to the setback group.