# Evaluating Neurogenic Bladder Management in Palestinian Healthcare: A Qualitative Study

## TL;DR

This study explores how neurogenic bladder is managed in Palestinian healthcare, revealing a lack of unified protocols and reliance on international guidelines.

## Contribution

The study identifies the absence of a standardized national protocol for neurogenic bladder management in Palestine and emphasizes the need for local guidelines.

## Key findings

- Urodynamic studies are crucial for diagnosis but no unified management protocol exists.
- Most urologists rely on the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines due to the lack of local protocols.
- Six major themes emerged, including challenges in diagnosis, management, and infection control.

## Abstract

Background: Neurogenic bladder (NB) is a prevalent urologic condition significantly impacting the health and quality of life of affected individuals. The condition, often resulting from various etiologies such as spinal cord injuries and multiple sclerosis, leads to severe life problems, including pain and impaired physical, mental, social, and emotional functioning. This study aims to explore the medical practices of urologists in the diagnosis, management, and care of NB patients within the Palestinian healthcare context, highlighting the absence of a unified treatment protocol and the reliance on private clinics for care.

Methods: An exploratory qualitative study design was employed, adhering to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. Structured interviews were conducted with 14 urologists and two urology residents across eight different cities in Palestine, including 10 governmental hospitals, two private hospitals, one university hospital, and one charity hospital. Fourteen doctors had private outpatient clinics alongside their work in hospitals. A questionnaire developed by the authors was delivered to specialists and residents to understand the evaluation, management, follow-up practices, and challenges faced in treating NB patients. The study focused on the diagnostic processes, treatment modalities, complications management, and the impact of the lack of standardized protocols on patient care.

Our qualitative study consists of six major themes, each theme consisting of multiple sub-themes and different participant responses: (1) diagnosis and follow-up of NB patients; (2) general issues in the management of NB; (3) evaluation and follow-up of upper and lower urinary system function in NB patients; (4) urinary tract infections associated with NB disease and how to deal with it; (5) opinions and future attitudes in the treatment of NB patients; (6) NB in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Results: The study found that urodynamic studies are crucial in NB diagnosis, yet there is no unified management protocol, leading to varied practices. Most participants preferred the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines in the absence of Palestinian protocols. Six major themes emerged, including diagnosis and follow-up challenges, general issues in NB management, evaluation and follow-up of urinary system function, urinary tract infections management, opinions on future treatment directions, and specific considerations for NB patients with multiple sclerosis.

Conclusions: The study highlights the need for a unified, standardized protocol for the management of NB patients in Palestine. The reliance on international guidelines, primarily the AUA protocols, underscores the gap in local healthcare policies. The findings call for the establishment of national guidelines and enhanced resources for the effective management of NB, aiming to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.