# Enhanced Surgical Techniques in Orthopedics: A Comprehensive Guide for Surgeons Based on Modification of the McFarland and Osborne Approach to the Hip

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a modified surgical approach for hip arthroplasty that reduces complications and improves patient outcomes compared to traditional methods.

## Contribution

A refined modification of the McFarland and Osborne approach with a detailed step-by-step surgical guide for hip procedures.

## Key findings

- Seven out of 14 patients returned to pre-injury mobility levels after surgery.
- The modified approach reduced dissection difficulty and risk to neurovascular structures.
- Only one patient experienced a significant decline in mobility post-surgery.

## Abstract

Introduction: The implementation of various approaches in hip arthroplasties introduces distinct advantages and complications. Notably, widely adopted methods such as the posterior approach have been linked to elevated rates of posterior hip dislocations and iatrogenic sciatic nerve injuries, while the lateral approach has been associated with superior gluteal nerve injuries.

In this study, we propose a refined modification of the McFarland and Osborne approach, aiming to amalgamate the most favorable aspects of prior modifications of the lateral approach to the hip. Additionally, our contribution extends to providing a comprehensive stepwise guide for the exposure and closure processes in cases of bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement. This modification not only offers potential advantages to seasoned orthopedic surgeons but also serves as a valuable resource for young Turks venturing into hip surgeries.

Material and methods: 14 patients with femoral neck fractures underwent surgery using the modified McFarland and Osborne approach and were followed up for a period of six months. The functional outcome was analyzed by the Modified Mobility and Aids Scoring Matrix.

Results: Seven of the 14 patients attained pre-injury status with respect to the Mobility and Aids scoring matrix. six patients had a fall of 1, and one patient had a fall of 2, as compared to pre-injury status.

Conclusion: Our research suggests that this method serves as a superior alternative to conventional approaches, demonstrating notable advantages in terms of dissection difficulty, reduced risk to neurovascular structures, and minimized post-operative hip dislocations. Additionally, it exhibits a favorable outcome, enabling a return to pre-injury levels of activity.