# Prophylactic Peri-Nephric Drain Placement in Renal Transplant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

**Authors:** Adil S. Lakha, Shahzaib Ahmed, James Hunter, John O’Callaghan

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.13030 · Transplant International · 2024-08-02

## TL;DR

This study reviews whether placing drains during kidney transplants reduces the need for further surgery and finds no strong evidence of benefit.

## Contribution

The paper provides a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of prophylactic drain placement in kidney transplant surgery.

## Key findings

- Prophylactic drain placement did not significantly reduce the need for reintervention after surgery.
- Drain use also did not significantly reduce perinephric collections or wound complications.
- There is insufficient evidence to support routine drain placement for improved graft survival.

## Abstract

Renal transplantation is common worldwide, with >25,000 procedures performed in 2022. Usage of prophylactic perinephric drains is variable in renal transplantation; drains are associated with risks, and there is a lack of consensus regarding benefit of routine drain placement in these patients. This meta-analysis assessed whether prophylactic drainage reduced need for reintervention postoperatively. This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out using the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, and prospectively registered on PROSPERO. Summary statistics for outcomes of interest underwent meta-analyses to a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and are presented as Forest Plots for Odds Ratio (OR). A systematic literature search in June 2023 revealed 1,540 unique articles across four databases. Of these, four retrospective cohort studies were selected. Meta-analysis of three studies showed no significant reduction in reintervention rate with pre-emptive drain placement, OR = 0.59 (95% CI: 0.16–2.23), p = 0.44. Meta-analysis did not show a significant reduction in perinephric collections with prophylactic drain insertion OR = 0.55 (95% CI: 0.13–2.37), p = 0.42. Finally, there is not good evidence that drain placement reduces superficial wound complications or improves 12-month graft survival. Further work is needed, including well-designed, prospective studies to assess the risks and benefits of drain placement in these patients.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023422685, Identifier PROSPERO CRD42021255795.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** wound complications (MESH:D014947)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11327091/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11327091/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11327091/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11327091