Complete circular assembly of Histophilus somni PDS1537697-81-1 genome and phenotypic characterization of its antibiotic susceptibility
Anatoliy Trokhymchuk, Nathan Erickson, Cheryl L. Waldner, Matthew G. Links

TL;DR
This paper reports the full genome assembly and antibiotic susceptibility testing of a Histophilus somni isolate from a healthy calf.
Contribution
The study provides a complete circular genome assembly and phenotypic characterization of an H. somni isolate.
Findings
A Histophilus somni isolate was obtained from a healthy calf.
The isolate's genome was fully sequenced and assembled in a circular form.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on the isolate.
Abstract
A Histophilus somni isolate from a clinically healthy, fall-placed calf was obtained upon arrival to a commercial feedlot. Fall-placed calves are commonly viewed to be at high risk for the development of bovine respiratory disease. The isolate was phenotyped for antimicrobial susceptibility and sequenced to obtain a complete, circular, genome assembly.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Antibiotic | Minimum inhibitory concentration (µg/mL) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Ampicillin | 0.3 | R (≥0.25) |
| Ceftioufur | 0.3 | S (≤2) |
| Chlortetracycline | 0.5 | NI |
| Clindamycin | 1.0 | NI |
| Danofloxacin | 0.1 | NI |
| Enrofloxacin | 0.1 | S (≤0.25) |
| Florfenicol | 0.3 | S (≤2) |
| Gentamicin | 16.0 | NI |
| Neomycin | 32.0 | NI |
| Oxytetracycline | 4.0 | NI |
| Penicillin | 0.1 | S (≤0.1) |
| Spectinomycin | 64.0 | I (=64) |
| Sulfadimethoxime | 256.0 | NI |
| Tiamulin | 2.0 | NI |
| Tilmicosin | 8.0 | NI |
| Trimethoprim/sulfa | 2.0 | NI |
| Tulathromycin | 16.0 | S (≤16) |
| Tylosin | 8.0 | NI |
- —Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMicrobial infections and disease research · Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
ANNOUNCEMENT
Histophilus somni is a significant bacterial pathogen in the bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex (1). Genomics-based tools can enhance diagnostic support for antimicrobial stewardship in BRD management but require the establishment of comprehensive reference data on isolates with known antibiotic susceptibility phenotypes (2).
In December 2015, a deep nasopharyngeal swab (Tiegland Modified Culture Swab, Jorgensen Laboratories, LLC, Loveland, CO, USA) was collected from a clinically healthy auction-sourced steer on arrival to a commercial feedlot (University of Saskatchewan Animal Research Ethics Board Certificate of Approval AUP#20150075), placed in Amies transport medium (eSwab Transport System Copan Diagnostics Inc., Murrieta, CA, USA), and delivered on ice to Prairie Diagnostic Services (PDS; Saskatoon, SK, Canada). H. somni PDS1537697-81-1 was isolated by plating 10 µL of the transport medium on a Chocolate agar plate, incubating for 48 h at 35°C in 5% CO_2_, and identified by MALDI-TOF MS (Microflex LT system, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) as previously described (3). The isolate was cryopreserved, in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB, Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) containing 15% glycerol at −80°C, after one passage. Recovery from cryopreservation was done by quadrant inoculation of a Chocolate agar plate and 18-h incubation at 35°C in 5% CO_2_. The culture purity and the organism identity were re-confirmed by analyzing single colonies of a characteristic morphology on a MALDI-TOF MS.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, as a single diagnostic submission, was performed by broth microdilution method (ThermoFisher Scientific, Nepean, ON, Canada) using 96-well Sensititre microtiter plates (BOPO6F, ThermoFisher Scientific; Table 1) as described previously (4).
Bacterial DNA was extracted from a fresh Chocolate agar plate after 18-h incubation at 35°C in 5% CO_2_ via MagAttract HMW DNA kit (Qiagen, Toronto, ON, Canada). Nucleic acid was confirmed to be of high molecular weight (peak concentration value > 60 kb) using a Genomic DNA Screen Tape on a 4200 TapeStation System (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). About 400 ng of the bacterial high molecular weight DNA was used for a sequencing library preparation with the Rapid Barcoding Sequencing gDNA kit as per the manufacturer’s protocol (SQK-RBK004, Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, United Kingdom). The prepared library was loaded on an FLO-PRO002 sequencing flow cell and sequenced on a PromethION P2Solo device connected to GridION X5 machine running on MinKNOW 23.11.3 software with real-time high accuracy basecalling. For de novo bacterial genome assembly, 12,000 reads/58.9 M bases (N50: 13,530, N75: 6,037, and N90: 2,415) and representing an estimated 27× coverage of the expected genome size of 2.18 Mb (5) were processed with the Dragonflye pipeline (v1.1.2)(6) with one round of medaka polishing (v1.11.3; using model r941_prom_hac_g507) (7), and one round of racon polisher (v.1.5.0) (8). The assembly resulted in a single circular 2,182,197 bp contig representing 20× coverage. Taxonomic classification of the assembled genome was performed using Kraken2 (minikraken reference database) (9) to confirm the isolate was H.somni. The assembly was annotated using PGAP (10) identifying 2,118 genes and a GC content of 37.3%. ABRicate (11) using the default database (12) identified the presence of tet(H), aadA3, sul2, aph(3″)-Ib, aph (6)-Id, and aph(3′)-Ia antimicrobial genes within the genome.
TABLE 1: Antibiotic susceptibility test results for Histophilus somni PDS1537697-81-1a
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Shirbroun RM. 2020. Histophilus somni: antigenic and genomic changes relevant to bovine respiratory disease. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 36:279–295. doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2020.02.00332327251 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Besser J, Carleton HA, Gerner-Smidt P, Lindsey RL, Trees E. 2018. Next-generation sequencing technologies and their application to the study and control of bacterial infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 24:335–341. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2017.10.01329074157 PMC 5857210 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Erickson NEN, Ngeleka MG, Lubbers BV, Trokhymchuk A. 2017 Changes in the rates of field isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial pathogens collected from fallplaced feedlot steers between arrival at the feedlot and 90 to 120 days on feed. Bov pract 2017:165–173. doi:10.21423/bovine-vol 51no 2p 165-173 · doi ↗
- 4Wennekamp TR, Waldner CL, Windeyer MC, Larson K, Trokhymchuk A, Campbell JR. 2022. Antimicrobial resistance in bovine respiratory disease: auction market- and ranch-raised calves. Can Vet J 63:47–54.34975167 PMC 8682930 · pubmed ↗
- 5Annotation of Histophilus somni USDA-ARS-USMARC-63369. 2022 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_CP 01
- 6Petit RAI. 2024. Dragonflye: assemble bacterial isolate genomes from nanopore reads. Github 2021. https://github.com/rpetit 3/dragonflye.
- 7Oxford Nanopore Technologies. 2018. Sequence correction provided by ONT research
- 8Vaser R, Sović I, Nagarajan N, Šikić M. 2017. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res 27:737–746. doi:10.1101/gr.214270.11628100585 PMC 5411768 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
