Correction to “When Fairness Is Not Enough: The Disproportionate Contributions of the Poor in a Collective Action Problem” by Malthouse et al. (2023)
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSocial Policy and Reform Studies
In the article “When Fairness Is Not Enough: The Disproportionate Contributions of the Poor in a Collective Action Problem” by Eugene Malthouse, Charlie Pilgrim, Daniel Sgroi, and Thomas T. Hills (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2023, Vol. 152, No. 11, pp. 3229–3242, https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001455), the third and final research question in The Collective-Risk Social Dilemma section now appears as follows: 3. If what people perceive as fair is insufficient to solve the problem, under what conditions do groups still manage to succeed? The online version of this article has been corrected.