# The top 50 most-cited articles about COVID-19 and the complications of COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis

**Authors:** Tanya Singh, Jagadish Rao Padubidri, Pavanchand H. Shetty, Matthew Antony Manoj, Therese Mary, Bhanu Thejaswi Pallempati, Husnul Khuluq, Matthew Antony Manoj

PMC · DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.145713.1 · F1000Research · 2024-02-16

## TL;DR

This paper analyzes the top 50 most-cited studies on COVID-19 complications to understand their impact and identify trends in research and authorship.

## Contribution

The study provides a novel bibliometric analysis of the most-cited articles on COVID-19 complications, highlighting trends in authorship, journals, and patient demographics.

## Key findings

- Most top-cited articles were published in 2020 and focused on clinical features of COVID-19.
- China contributed the most to these studies, with The Lancet, NEJM, and JAMA as leading journals.
- Complications affected 13.9% of patients, with a recovery rate of 57.8%.

## Abstract

This bibliometric analysis examines the top 50 most-cited articles on COVID-19 complications, offering insights into the multifaceted impact of the virus. Since its emergence in Wuhan in December 2019, COVID-19 has evolved into a global health crisis, with over 770 million confirmed cases and 6.9 million deaths as of September 2023. Initially recognized as a respiratory illness causing pneumonia and ARDS, its diverse complications extend to cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal, hematological, neurological, endocrinological, ophthalmological, hepatobiliary, and dermatological systems.

Identifying the top 50 articles from a pool of 5940 in Scopus, the analysis spans November 2019 to July 2021, employing terms related to COVID-19 and complications. Rigorous review criteria excluded non-relevant studies, basic science research, and animal models. The authors independently reviewed articles, considering factors like title, citations, publication year, journal, impact factor, authors, study details, and patient demographics.

The focus is primarily on 2020 publications (96%), with all articles being open access. Leading journals include The Lancet, NEJM, and JAMA, with prominent contributions from Internal Medicine (46.9%) and Pulmonary Medicine (14.5%). China played a major role (34.9%), followed by France and Belgium. Clinical features were the primary study topic (68%), often utilizing retrospective designs (24%). Among 22,477 patients analyzed, 54.8% were male, with the most common age group being 26-65 years (63.2%). Complications of COVID-19 affected 13.9% of patients, with a recovery rate of 57.8%.

Analyzing these top-cited articles offers clinicians and researchers a comprehensive, timely understanding of influential COVID-19 literature. This approach uncovers attributes contributing to high citations and provides authors with valuable insights for crafting impactful research. As a strategic tool, this analysis facilitates staying updated and making meaningful contributions to the dynamic field of COVID-19 research.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MONDO:0100096), pneumonia (MONDO:0005249), ARDS (MONDO:0006502)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** deaths (MESH:D003643), respiratory illness (MESH:D012140), ARDS (MESH:D012128), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), pneumonia (MESH:D011014)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11325134/full.md

## References

16 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11325134/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11325134