# Thoracic radiation in combination with erlotinib—results from a phase 2 randomized trial

**Authors:** Hanne Marte Nymoen, Tine Norman Alver, Henrik Horndalsveen, Hanne Astrid Eide, Maria Moksnes Bjaanæs, Odd Terje Brustugun, Bjørn Henning Grønberg, Vilde Drageset Haakensen, Åslaug Helland

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1412716 · Frontiers in Oncology · 2024-08-01

## TL;DR

A clinical trial found that combining erlotinib with thoracic radiation for advanced lung cancer did not improve outcomes but was well tolerated.

## Contribution

This study is the first randomized trial to evaluate the combination of erlotinib and palliative thoracic radiation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

## Key findings

- Combining erlotinib with thoracic radiation did not significantly improve tumor size reduction or survival.
- The treatment combination was well tolerated without increased adverse events.
- Quality of life was similar between the two treatment groups.

## Abstract

Radiotherapy (RT) can be used to reduce symptoms and maintain open airways for patients with non-small cell lung cancer when systemic treatment is not sufficient. For some patients, tumor control is not achieved due to radioresistance. Concurrent inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptors has been proposed as a strategy to overcome radioresistance but may increase toxicity. We performed a randomized trial to assess the efficacy, tolerance, and quality of life of concurrent erlotinib and palliative thoracic RT for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Patients were randomized 1:1 to RT alone (arm A) or in combination with erlotinib (arm B). A computed tomography (CT) scan at baseline and one at 4–12 weeks after inclusion was used to evaluate treatment response. Adverse events were registered during treatment and the subsequent 30 days. Health-related quality-of-life questionnaires were completed by the patients at baseline, weeks 2, 6, and 20.

A total of 114 patients were included. Of the 74 patients with CT scans available for evaluation of treatment effect, there were no significant differences in tumor size reduction between the two groups: median 14.5% reduction in the control arm A and 17.0% in the erlotinib arm B (p = 0.68). Overall survival was not significantly different between the two treatment arms: 7.0 and 7.8 months in arm A and arm B, respectively (log-rank p = 0.32). There was no significant increase in adverse events in the experimental arm, other than what is expected from erlotinib treatment alone. Overall, patients reported similar quality of life in both treatment arms.

Concurrent erlotinib and palliative thoracic RT for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer was well tolerated but did not improve the efficacy of the RT.

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02714530.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** erlotinib (PubChem CID 176870)
- **Diseases:** non-small cell lung cancer (MONDO:0005233)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** tumor (MESH:D009369), non-small cell lung cancer (MESH:D002289), toxicity (MESH:D064420)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11324589/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11324589/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11324589/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11324589