Correction to: Antimicrobial resistance among indicator Enterococcus faecium and Escherichia coli in Swedish pig farms
Valeriia Ladyhina, Susanna Sternberg‑Lewerin, Linus Andersson, Elisabeth Rajala
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Correction to: Antimicrobial resistance among indicator Enterococcus faecium and Escherichia coli in Swedish pig farms
10.1186/s13028-024-00756-8
Following publication of the original article [1], we have been notified that Figs. 1 and 2 were published incorrectly.
Fig. 1. Distribution of MIC values of E. coli isolates (n = 122). Red and green cells indicate the range of tested concentrations. Vertical black lines indicate EUCAST epidemiological cutoffs
Fig. 2. Distribution of MIC values of E. faecium isolates (n = 74). Red and green cells indicate the range of tested concentrations. Vertical black lines indicate EUCAST epidemiological cutoffs
It should be as follows:
Fig. 1. Distribution of MIC values of E. coli isolates (n = 122). Red and green cells indicate the range of tested concentrations. Vertical black lines indicate EUCAST epidemiological cutoffs
Fig. 2. Distribution of MIC values of E. faecium isolates (n = 74). Red and green cells indicate the range of tested concentrations. Vertical black lines indicate EUCAST epidemiological cutoffs
The original article was updated.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.