Correction: Chitosan-gated organic transistors printed on ethyl cellulose as a versatile platform for edible electronics and bioelectronics
Alina S. Sharova, Francesco Modena, Alessandro Luzio, Filippo Melloni, Pietro Cataldi, Fabrizio Viola, Leonardo Lamanna, Nicolas F. Zorn, Mauro Sassi, Carlotta Ronchi, Jana Zaumseil, Luca Beverina, Maria Rosa Antognazza, Mario Caironi
TL;DR
This paper corrects a previous study on chitosan-gated organic transistors for use in edible and bioelectronics.
Contribution
The paper provides corrections to previously published research on organic transistors for edible electronics.
Findings
The corrections address errors in the original publication.
The revised information ensures accuracy in the reported experimental details.
Abstract
Correction for ‘Chitosan-gated organic transistors printed on ethyl cellulose as a versatile platform for edible electronics and bioelectronics’ by Alina S. Sharova et al., Nanoscale, 2023, 15, 10808–10819, https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NR01051A.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —H2020 European Research Council10.13039/100010663
- —European Commission10.13039/501100000780
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsConducting polymers and applications
The authors regret that in the original article the weight of semiconductors present for each inverter was erroneously reported, due to a calculation error. Table 1 indicated a “Dose per device” of 4 pg for both P3HT and P(NDI-C4-TEGMe-T2), however, the correct doses are 8.4 ng for P3HT and 16 ng for P(NDI-C4-TEGMe-T2). The authors confirm that the main findings and conclusions of the work are not affected by this error. While the actual dose of semiconductors per inverter is three orders of magnitude greater than what erroneously reported in the original manuscript, such a value still represents a very small trace with respect to the total volume of the device, i.e., nanograms vs. milligrams.
The correct Table 1 is reported below:
In addition:
-
In the abstract: “including biocompatible polymers present in the picogram range per device” should be: “including biocompatible polymers present in the nanogram range per device”.
-
On page 10816, left column, line 24: “range of picograms per device” should be: “range of nanograms per device”.
-
On page 10816, right column, line 21: “i.e. picograms per transistor” should be: “i.e. nanograms per transistor”.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.