Author Correction: Clinical features and treatment outcomes of intraocular and ocular adnexal metastasis
Wantanee Dangboon Tsutsumi, Apinya Rattanasuwan, Orapan Aryasit
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOcular Oncology and Treatments
Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-024-64464-z, published online 03 July 2024
The original version of this Article contained errors in the Figure legends of Figure 1 and Figure 2. The legends of these Figures were inadvertently switched.
The legend of Figure 1:
“Kaplan–Meier survival estimates of the overall survival. (a) All patients; (b) age ≤ 50 years vs. > 50 years; (c) primary cancer origin; and (d) treatment group vs. observation group.”
now reads:
“A 26-year-old woman presents with flashing and reduced vision in the right eye: (a) Color fundus photography indicates pale yellow choroidal mass; (b) Hypo-reflective elevated choroidal mass with subretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography; (c) Ultrasonography shows a hypoechoic dome shape mass with moderate variable amplitude of internal reflectivity on A-scan; and (d) Lung mass with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma.”
The legend of Figure 2:
“A 26-year-old woman presents with flashing and reduced vision in the right eye: (a) Color fundus photography indicates pale yellow choroidal mass; (b) Hypo-reflective elevated choroidal mass with subretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography; (c) Ultrasonography shows a hypoechoic dome shape mass with moderate variable amplitude of internal reflectivity on A-scan; and (d) Lung mass with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma.”
now reads:
“Kaplan–Meier survival estimates of the overall survival. (a) All patients; (b) age ≤ 50 years vs. > 50 years; (c) primary cancer origin; and (d) treatment group vs. observation group.”
The original Article has been corrected.