Correction to: Safety and effectiveness of Evicel® fibrin sealant as an adjunct to sutured dural repair in children undergoing cranial neurosurgery
Gnanamurthy Sivakumar, Shailendra Magdum, Kristian Aquilina, Jothy Kandasamy, Vivek Josan, Bogdan Ilie, Ellie Barnett, Richard Kocharian, Benedetta Pettorini

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHead and Neck Surgical Oncology · Hemostasis and retained surgical items · Urological Disorders and Treatments
Correction to: Child’s Nervous System
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-024-06434-4
In Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of this article, there are sub-entries that requires indentions for readers clarity. Below are the updated tables. Table 1. Patient Characteristics (ITT Set). Medical history shows disorders that occurred in ≥10% of subjects.Evicel® (N=25)Sutures (N=15)Age (years), median (range)10.0 (0.8,17.0)10.0 (0.6,15.0)Male/Female ratio, n (%)/n (%)14 (56.0 %) / 11 (44.0%)9 (60.0%) / 6 (40.0%)BMI (kg/m^2^), median (range) ^a^18.1 (13.4,33.8)18.5 (14.0,23.7)Medical History, n (%) Any previous surgery8 (32.0%)4 (26.7%) Neoplasms16 (64.0%)11 (73.3%) Nervous system disorders14 (56.0%)12 (80.0%) Congenital/genetic disorders9 (36.0%)4 (26.7%) Immune disorders4 (16.0%)0 Cardiac disorders2 (8.0%)2 (13.3%) Infectious disorders4 (16.0%)0^a^ Evicel® n=15, Sutures n=10Table 2Procedural Characteristics (ITT Set).Evicel® (N=25)Sutures (N=15)Operative procedure Procedure type, n subjects (% of total N) Craniotomy24 (96.0%)15 (100.0%) Craniectomy1 (4.0%)0 (0.0%) Approach, n subjects (% of total N) Infratentorial4 (16.0%)3 (20.0%) Intracranial tumor3 (12.0%)3 (20.0%) Chiari malformation1 (4.0%)0 Supratentorial21 (84.0%)12 (80.0%) Intracranial tumor13 (52.0%)9 (60.0%) Epilepsy6 (24.0%)1 (6.7%) A-V malformation2 (8.0%)1 (6.7%) Arachnoid cyst01 (6.7%) CSF leak before randomization, n subjects (% of total N) Spontaneous14 (56.0%)10 (66.7%) After Valsalva Maneuver11 (44.0%)5 (33.3%) Duration of surgery, min, median (range) ^a^305 (123, 452)288 (188, 675) Time in operation room, min, median (range) ^a^376 (160, 561)361 (214, 778) Postoperative hospital stay, nights, median (range) 5 (2, 25)7 (2, 35)^a^ Evicel® n=23, Sutures n=14.Table 3. Treatment Parameters and Intra-operative Outcomes (Safety Set).Evicel®N = 26Number of layers within each treatment, n subjects (% of total N = 26) 1^st^* Treatment1 layer18 (69.2%)2 layers8 (30.8%) 2^nd^ Treatment1 layer1 (3.9%)2 layers2 (7.7%)Intra-operative outcome following each treatment, n subjects (% of total N = 26) 1st TreatmentNo CSF Leak23 (88.5%)CSF Leak 3 (11.5%) 2nd TreatmentNo CSF Leak0CSF Leak3 (11.5%)Rescue treatment, n subjects (%)3 (11.5%)^a^**SuturesN = 14Number of additional sutures, median (range)2.0 (1.0,12.0)Additional treatment for durability, n subjects (%)1 (7.1%) ^b^Intra-operative outcome, n subjects (% of total N)No CSF leak5 (35.7%)CSF leak9 (64.3%)Rescue treatment, n subjects (% of total N)9 (64.3%)^c^^a^Infratentorial: DuraSeal® n = 1, Surgicel® + Duragen® + Duraguard® n = 1. Supratentorial: Tisseel® + Surgicel® n = 1^b^Surgicel® Fibrillar^c^Infratentorial: Pericranium n = 1, Adherus® + Duraguard® n = 1. Supratentorial: Tisseel® n = 2, Tisseel® + Surgicel® n = 1, Tisseel® + Duragen® n = 1, Tisseel® + Surgicel® + fascia n = 1, Surgicel® + Gelfoam® n = 1, Gelfoam® + Spongostan® n = 1Table 4Primary Efficacy Analysis and Sensitivity Analyses. Success was defined as the achievement of intra-operative watertight closure after completion of the randomized treatment, as assessed by provocative testing with Valsalva maneuver.Evicel®Success Rate% (n/N)SuturesSuccess Rate% (n/N)Estimated P_E_/P_S_Farrington-Manning95% CI for P_E_/P_S_Intention-to-treat set* Overall group92.0% (23/25)33.3% (5/15)2.76(1.53, 6.16) Infratentorial50.0% (2/4)0.0% (0/3) Supratentorial100.0% (21/21)41.7% (5/12)Per protocol set Overall group90.9% (20/22)40.0% (4/10)2.27(1.27, 5.53)Safety set Overall group88.5% (23/26)35.7% (5/14)2.48(1.39, 5.52)P_E_/P_S_, Proportion successes in Evicel® group / Proportion successes in Sutures groupCI, Confidence IntervalTable 5Adverse Events and Relatedness to Study Product (Determined for Evicel® Group Only) and Procedure (Safety Set).Evicel® (N=26)Sutures (N=14)Individual AE, n (%) Individual AEs118110 Related or possibly related to study product0N/A Related or possibly related to study procedure71 (60.2%)73 (66.4%) Individual SAEs716 ^a^ Related or possibly related to study product1 (3.8%) ^b^N/A Related or possibly related to study procedure6 (85.7%) ^c^14 (87.5%) ^d^Subjects with AE, n (%) ≥ 1 AE22 (84.6%)14 (100.0%) ≥ 1 Serious AE5 (19.2%)8 (57.1%) ≥ 1 Severe AE2 (7.7%)1 (7.1%) ≥ 1 AE related or possibly related to product0N/A ≥ 1 SAE related or possibly related to product1 (3.8%) ^b^N/A ≥ 1 AE related or possibly related to procedure21 (80.8%)12 (85.7%) ≥ 1 SAE related or possibly related to procedure5 (19.2%)7 (50.0%)^a^ Partial seizure, neurofibromatosis and 14 other SAE as detailed in footnote (d)^b^ Pseudomeningocele (Causality upgraded by Sponsor)^c^ Diabetes insipidus, pyrexia, meningitis, medulloblastoma recurrence, convulsive seizure, hydrocephalus (due to malfunction existing CSF shunt),^d^ Pseudomeningocele with iCSF leak (n=1), pseudomeningocele without iCSF leak (n=4), hematoma (n=2), vomiting (n=1), hemorrhagic cyst (n=1), shunt infection (n=1), pneumocephalus (n=1), transverse sinus thrombosis (n=1), hydrocephalus (due to malfunction existing CSF shunt) n=1, hydrocephalus (due to choroid plexus carcinoma and intraventricular blood collection) n=1.Table 6. Surgical Site Complications Observed within 30 Days Postoperatively (Safety Set). All complications are also reported as AEs (Table 5).Surgical site complications, n subjects (%)Evicel® (N=26)Sutures (N=1≥ 1 surgical site complication9 (34.6%)8 (57.1%)CSF leakage1 (3.8%)5 (35.7%) Incisional CSF leakage00 Pseudomeningocele1 (3.8%) ^a^4 (28.6 %) ^b^ Pseudomeningocele and incisional CSF leakage01 (7.1%) ^c^Infection1 (3.8%)1 (7.1%)Hematoma1 (3.8%)1 (7.1%)Other6 (23.1%) ^d^6 (42.9%) ^e^^a^ No treatment needed.^b^ Treated with CSF shunt (n=2), no treatment needed (n=2).^c^ Treated with pressure bandage and re-suturing.^d^ Itchy wound, soreness/numbness, hydrocephalus (due to malfunction existing CSF shunt), subgaleal collection, subgaleal swelling, weeping sutures.^e^ Hydrocephalus (due to intraventricular blood collection), hydrocephalus (due to malfunction existing CSF shunt), non-occlusive sinus transversus thrombus, wound swelling, pneumocephalus, bruising.
The original article has been corrected.
