# Integrative approach to pedobarography and pelvis-trunk motion for knee osteoarthritis detection and exploration of non-radiographic rehabilitation monitoring

**Authors:** Arnab Sarmah, Lipika Boruah, Satoshi Ito, Subramani Kanagaraj

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1401153 · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · 2024-07-31

## TL;DR

This study uses gait and muscle activity data to detect knee osteoarthritis and monitor rehabilitation, offering a non-radiographic and wearable-friendly approach.

## Contribution

The novel integration of pedobarography, pelvis-trunk motion, and sEMG data with machine learning for KOA detection and rehabilitation monitoring is presented.

## Key findings

- KOA was detected with 89.3% accuracy using gait and trunk motion data with a decision tree classifier.
- sEMG data successfully clustered healthy and KOA subjects, with wavelet features performing best during standing.
- Wearable sensors and gait data provide a non-radiographic, safe method for KOA identification and rehabilitation.

## Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent global musculoskeletal disorder, and knee OA (KOA) accounts for four-fifths of the cases worldwide. It is a degenerative disorder that greatly affects the quality of life. Thus, it is managed through different methods, such as weight loss, physical therapy, and knee arthroplasty. Physical therapy aims to strengthen the knee periarticular muscles to improve joint stability.

Pedobarographic data and pelvis and trunk motion of 56 adults are recorded. Among them, 28 subjects were healthy, and 28 subjects were suffering from varying degrees of KOA. Age, sex, BMI, and the recorded variables are used together to identify subjects with KOA using machine learning (ML) models, namely, logistic regression, SVM, decision tree, and random forest. Surface electromyography (sEMG) signals are also recorded bilaterally from two muscles, the rectus femoris and biceps femoris caput longus, bilaterally during various activities for two healthy and six KOA subjects. Cluster analysis is then performed using the principal components obtained from time-series features, frequency features, and time–frequency features.

KOA is successfully identified using the pedobarographic data and the pelvis and trunk motion with the highest accuracy and sensitivity of 89.3% and 85.7%, respectively, using a decision tree classifier. In addition, sEMG data have been successfully used to cluster healthy subjects from KOA subjects, with wavelet analysis features providing the best performance for the standing activity under different conditions.

KOA is detected using gait variables not directly related to the knee, such as pedobarographic measurements and pelvis and trunk motion captured by pedobarography mats and wearable sensors, respectively. KOA subjects are also distinguished from healthy individuals through clustering analysis using sEMG data from knee periarticular muscles during walking and standing. Gait data and sEMG complement each other, aiding in KOA identification and rehabilitation monitoring. It is important because wearable sensors simplify data collection, require minimal sample preparation, and offer a non-radiographic, safe method suitable for both laboratory and real-world scenarios. The decision tree classifier, trained with stratified k-fold cross validation (SKCV) data, is observed to be the best for KOA identification using gait data.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** osteoarthritis (MONDO:0005178)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** KOA (MESH:D020370), weight loss (MESH:D015431), degenerative disorder (MESH:D019636), OA (MESH:D010003), musculoskeletal disorder (MESH:D009140)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11321954/full.md

## Figures

10 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11321954/full.md

## References

52 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11321954/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11321954