# Does implicit mentalizing involve the representation of others' mental state content? Examining domain-specificity with an adapted Joint Simon task

**Authors:** Malcolm K. Y. Wong, Marina Bazhydai, Calum Hartley, J. Jessica Wang

PMC · DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230239 · Royal Society Open Science · 2024-08-14

## TL;DR

This study explores whether implicit mentalizing involves understanding others' mental states by adapting the Joint Simon task and using a surprise recognition task.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel Joint Simon task with a surprise recognition component to examine co-representation and domain-specificity.

## Key findings

- No significant Joint Simon effect was observed, limiting conclusions about domain-specificity.
- Participants in the Joint task did not recognize their partner's stimuli more accurately than those in the Individual task.
- The study highlights methodological advancements in eliciting co-representation and the utility of surprise recognition tasks.

## Abstract

Implicit mentalizing involves the automatic awareness of others’ perspectives, but its domain-specificity is debated. The Joint Simon task demonstrates implicit mentalizing as a Joint Simon effect (JSE), proposed to stem from spontaneous action co-representation of a social partner's frame of reference in the Joint (but not Individual) task. However, evidence also shows that any sufficiently salient entity (not necessarily social) can induce the JSE. Here, we investigated the content of co-representation through a novel Joint Simon task where participants viewed a set of distinct images assigned to either themselves or their partner. Critically, a surprise image recognition task allowed us to identify partner-driven effects exclusive to the Joint task-sharing condition, versus the Individual condition. We did not observe a significant JSE, preventing us from drawing confident conclusions about the effect's domain-specificity. However, the recognition task results revealed that participants in the Joint task did not recognize their partner's stimuli more accurately than participants in the Individual task. This implies that participants were no more likely to encode content from their partner's perspective during the Joint task. Overall, this study pushes methodological boundaries regarding the elicitation of co-representation in the Joint Simon task and demonstrates the potential utility of a surprise recognition task.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11321851/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11321851/full.md

## References

78 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11321851/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11321851