# Plant characterization of insect-protected soybean

## TL;DR

This study compares insect-protected soybean with conventional soybean to assess environmental risks and finds no significant differences in plant characteristics.

## Contribution

Demonstrates data transportability of environmental risk assessments for GM soybean across regions and methodologies.

## Key findings

- Insect-protected soybean did not differ from conventional soybean in agronomic, phenotypic, competitiveness, and survival characteristics.
- Risk assessment conclusions were consistent across different regions, seasons, germplasm, and testing methodologies.
- Results support the transportability of data for assessing GM crop environmental risks globally.

## Abstract

Insect-protected soybean (SIP) that produces the Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2 insecticidal crystal proteins has been developed to provide protection from feeding damage caused by targeted lepidopteran insect pests. Typically, as part of environmental risk assessment (ERA), plant characterization is conducted, and the data submitted to regulatory agencies prior to commercialization of genetically modified (GM) crops. The objectives of this research were to: (a) compare soybean with and without the SIP trait in plant characterization field trials designed to fulfill requirements for submissions to global regulatory agencies and address China-specific considerations and (b) compare risk assessment conclusions across regions and the methodologies used in the field trials. The soybean with and without the SIP trait in temperate, tropical, and subtropical germplasm were planted in replicated multi-location trials in the USA (in 2012 and 2018) and Brazil (in 2013/2014 and 2017/2018). Agronomic, phenotypic, plant competitiveness, and survival characteristics were assessed for soybean entries with and without the SIP trait. Regardless of genetic background, growing region, season, or testing methodology, the risk assessment conclusions were the same: the evaluated insect-protected soybean did not differ from conventional soybean in evaluated agronomic, phenotypic, competitiveness, and survival characteristics indicating no change in plant pest/weed potential. These results reinforce the concept of data transportability across global regions, different seasons, germplasm, and methodologies that should be considered when assessing environmental risks of GM crops.