Over-specification of small, borderline cardinalities and color in referential communication: the role of visual context, modifier position, and consistency
Natalia A. Zevakhina, Kseniya N. Dongarova, Daria Shubina, Daria P. Popova
TL;DR
This paper explores how people describe small numbers and colors in communication, finding that small numbers are more likely to be over-specified due to their visual salience.
Contribution
The study introduces new evidence on how visual context and ordering influence over-specification rates in referential communication.
Findings
Small cardinalities are more salient and lead to higher over-specification rates than color.
Ordered presentation of borderline cardinalities increases over-specification and prenominal numeral use.
Russian speakers prefer prenominal positions for numerals due to their greater salience.
Abstract
This paper reports on two flash-mode experiments that test redundant descriptions of small (2–4) cardinalities, borderline (5–8) cardinalities, and color in referential communication. It provides further support for the idea that small cardinalities are more salient (due to subitizing), less sensitive to visual context, and therefore give rise to higher over-specification rates than color. Because of greater salience, Russian speakers more often use prenominal positions for numerals than for color adjectives. The paper also investigates borderline cardinalities and argues for the order factor that affects their salience, since ordered items can be perceived in small subitized parts. The ordered mode of presentation of the borderline cardinalities leads to higher over-specification rates and to higher percentages of prenominal positions than the unordered one. The paper provides further…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCategorization, perception, and language · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Speech and dialogue systems