# Microbiological Profiles of the Anatomical Sites of Perforation Peritonitis: A Cross-Sectional Study

## TL;DR

This study analyzed peritoneal fluid from patients with perforation peritonitis to determine the most common bacteria and effective antibiotics based on the site of perforation.

## Contribution

The study provides site-specific microbiological data and antibiotic sensitivity profiles for perforation peritonitis.

## Key findings

- E. coli and Klebsiella were the most common bacteria across all perforation sites.
- Amikacin and meropenem showed the highest sensitivity against isolated organisms.
- High resistance to third-generation cephalosporins was observed.

## Abstract

Introduction

One of the most frequent emergencies that a general surgeon deals with is perforation peritonitis. The anatomical site of the perforation, which in turn affects the source of infection, has a major impact on the mortality rate due to perforation peritonitis. Early and suitable antibiotic therapy can be started in the postoperative period with the aid of knowledge about the microbiological profile and sensitivity of peritoneal fluid culture with respect to the anatomical sites of perforation peritonitis.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2021 to November 2021 where peritoneal fluid samples were collected intraoperatively from patients with perforation peritonitis. This was subjected to culture and sensitivity, and results were analyzed with respect to anatomical sites of perforation.

Results

Forty cases were investigated. The ileum (30%) was the most common site of perforation, followed by the stomach (22.5%), appendix (20%), duodenum (12.5%), caecum (5%), jejunum (5%), transverse colon (2.5%), and rectum (2.5%). Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Klebsiella spp. were the most frequently found organisms in all sites of perforation peritonitis. The most sensitive antibiotics covering all isolated organisms were amikacin and meropenem. Sensitivity to amikacin was found in 85.18% of cases of E. coli and 84.6% of cases of Klebsiella. Sensitivity to meropenem was found in 76.9% of cases of E. coli and 80% of cases of Klebsiella.

Conclusion

In patients with perforation peritonitis, the peritoneal fluid cultures did not reflect the major differential normal flora according to the region of the gastrointestinal tract. The most prevalent organism isolated among all the sites of perforation peritonitis was E. coli. Antimicrobial activity against organisms isolated from perforation peritonitis patients was significantly demonstrated by aminoglycosides, piperacillin and tazobactam, and meropenem and colistin, with considerable resistance to third-generation cephalosporins.