Using inpatient telehealth for family engagement: A mixed methods study of perceptions from patients, families, and care team providers
Jennifer L. Rosenthal, Jacob Williams, Keegan F. Bowers, Sarah C. Haynes, Lori Kennedy

TL;DR
A study found that inpatient telehealth improves family engagement in patient care but faces adoption challenges due to low awareness.
Contribution
This study introduces a mixed methods approach to evaluate inpatient telehealth's impact on family engagement from multiple stakeholder perspectives.
Findings
Participants rated inpatient telehealth highly, with family members showing the highest satisfaction.
Three key themes emerged: enhanced relationships, improved care through information sharing, and low program awareness.
Despite positive perceptions, patients and providers reported relatively lower satisfaction with the program.
Abstract
The Inpatient Telehealth Program permits family to remotely communicate with the patient and care team through secure, live video. We aimed to assess the implementation of this program for family engagement from the perspectives of patients, families, and providers. We used a convergent mixed methods design. The quantitative component was a cross-sectional analysis of surveys assessing patient, family, and provider experience. The qualitative component used thematic analysis of patient, family, and provider interviews plus survey free text responses. We performed memo-writing and coding. We developed hypotheses about relationships among categories and identified analytic themes. We used data transformation and narrative discussion to report the integrated findings. Surveys from 214 individuals (33 patients, 145 family, 36 providers) were evaluated. Mean (standard deviation) experience…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLibraries, Manuscripts, and Books · Historical Art and Architecture Studies · Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
